Re: Number of Ascended and Collection not Match
Please check the info in the Collection's Records Stats.
It is possible to have Resolved correlations:
Re: Number of Ascended and Collection not Match
Offtopic:
- Walk-Forward Validation my not work well after the Optimizer. The reason is that once the strategy is optimized for the full data set, it is unlikely to find a good result when optimizing in chunks.
- There is something wrong in the WF and the Monte Carlo settings. The may not validate 100% of the strategies. If you think, it is correct, simply disable WF and Monte Carlo to reduce the Global warming.
Re: Number of Ascended and Collection not Match
Please check the info in the Collection's Records Stats.
It is possible to have Resolved correlations
Thanks Mr Popov for your quick reply.
Resolved correlated means similar strategies, right?
I just noticed that I have 126 pushed total strategies and 124 are resolved correlated. So, I just have wait and let the reactor do its job.
Offtopic:
- Walk-Forward Validation my not work well after the Optimizer. The reason is that once the strategy is optimized for the full data set, it is unlikely to find a good result when optimizing in chunks.- There is something wrong in the WF and the Monte Carlo settings. The may not validate 100% of the strategies. If you think, it is correct, simply disable WF and Monte Carlo to reduce the Global warming.
Does it mean I only need either one:
(a) Full Data optimization + Monte Carlo validation
(b) Walk Forward validation + Monte Carlo validation (without optimization)
How about Walk Forward optimization + Walk Forward validation + Monte Carlo validation?
Re: Number of Ascended and Collection not Match
I personally prefer variant (b).
Please see these topics for more info regarding Walk Forward: Walk Forward Internals Explained.