Normally the result must be the same with or without intrabar (shorter periods) data. The intrabar scanning serves to reduce the Ambiguous bars when the strategy has tight buy-sell levels.

FSB is designed to calculate strategies in real time and this is achievable only when the data series length is limited. The other variant wold be the MT backtester - more data and no strategy generator.

If you don't receive ambiguous bars, you don't need intrabar data at all. However it mostly depend on the strategy design.

I'll check that. If it doesn't work, I'll fix ir. This is the way to increase the number of bars.

This is the maximum length of the data series of shorter periods. You currently have 72718 bars and that means the limit is not reached. If the shorter period data series was longer, than FSB would cut it off to 100 000 bars.

I think it could be nice to have something like that for cs indicators editing using even a simple editor or calling a linked Notepad, save, compile and refresh

I am certainly not an expert on the topic but I am curious. It looks to me like putting more historical data into FSB will not generate much different results, not to say no better results. So if more bars doesn't mean more accurate calculation or better result, why would you at all want to put them there?

So you want to reduce curve-fitting by using more bars? That sounds like a good idea.

The search for Grail is open here.

There are and other possibilities i.e. treating the behavior of indicators. It depends on approach of trading, which is limited by the kind of indicators used to see success or not.

The search for Grail is open and here and I did not discover it myself.

Generally speaking indicators help to see a situation better. EAs use that to extend a situation to the future.
How lucky they can be it depends on their "stability" behavior. There are theories speaking on that. Μonte Carlo is one example of it.

I would like to see indicators applied to the Balance Data by Popov. Anyway...

Trend Lines, EMAs and more.

The main  idea is  to leave EA to run only when trend of wins exists (the easy part). Just an idea.
This part means some restrictions. But it does not look difficult to be selected.

In Electronics is the feedback signal. Which is used to correct the EA appropriately.

I do not agreed on that. A major impact is impossible to do not be applied. Something was not made well.

I have software that applies some indicators to the balance of the results in a report, that might be good if using it for daily trading, I have not seen anything that would work with intraday trading. For measuring the equity line. looks good.

Best to ask Tickstory on the Tickstory site as they are the ones that have the knowledge.

You can browse the documentation to learn of the JForex qualities and requirements.

Myself, I just use the data provided in FSBPro as it comes from the same place as Tickstory and seems to be satisfactory for my purpose.

I think that Tickstory when configured to do so will enable MT4 to use tickdata.

I usually work with higher time frames and do not see any need for tickdata.

I am not really the one to ask advanced questions of, I use FSBPro 'out of the box' and am not really interested in sophistication, FSBPro offers a heck of a lot as it is.

Currently, under the 1 min period, the available data in FSB is about 1.5 months which is very short and hence, generate a lot of curve fitting outcome.

I use a lot of  1min and 5 min period, hence, how many years or bars are sufficient to prevent curve fitting?  And what adjustments do I need to do to my FSB in order to obtain more historical data or bars?  I'm totally ignorant in this area, please help and give step by step instructions.