Dear Jurgen, I know we had a negative exchange in the past, and I have no intention of repeating that here.
This space should stay focused on methods, data, and constructive exchange — not personal issues.
Just to be clear: in none of my posts have I ever shared trading results or performance claims.
What I share here is about developing topics and workflows, not promoting systems or selling anything.
Since I bought EA Studio, I’ve reached out to many users to learn from their experience — including Popov, the creator of EA Studio, with whom I’ve have regular exchanges about ideas and workflow development.
That’s the purpose of being active here: sharing, learning, and improving through open discussion — nothing commercial, nothing hidden.
Regarding your accusation about “manipulating results” or “moving accounts between brokers” — that’s simply false.
I use multiple brokers intentionally for cross-validation and robustness testing, which is a standard and transparent practice in algorithmic research. Nothing is hidden or altered; everything I post can be verified or replicated by anyone who wants to test it.
My Darwinex account is fully public, with a four-year live track record that includes both investor capital and platform allocations. The goal isn’t to “look good” — that would be impossible to fake without being delisted — but to trade consistently and within a defined risk framework.
In live trading, the ability to pause, replace, or add EAs to hedge or manage drawdowns isn’t manipulation; it’s one of the core skills of responsible risk management.
I’m sharing my current journey focused on building a repeatable, data-driven process with EA Studio, while my older profitable accounts were based on third-party EAs, which I’ve always acknowledged openly.
They’re two different paths — one past and still running, one experimental and evolving.
If you want to discuss methodology, validation logic, or testing processes, I’m open to that.
But I won’t engage in personal arguments — they don’t help anyone and only distract from what really matters.
Let’s keep the conversation technical and useful for the community.
All the best
Vincenzo
Jurgen2100 wrote:Vincenzo, you’re not stupid but right now you’re making a fool of yourself in front of everyone.
The fact that you keep ignoring the truth I wrote about your grid accounts and the way you manipulate your Darwin curves says enough.
People are not blind, and they’re not stupid. They can see exactly what you’re doing.
You talk like an expert, but anyone who has seen your live setups knows the reality:
almost all of your profitable accounts are grid systems, and when things start failing, you move them around between brokers to protect the image.
That’s not transparency, that’s theater.
You can talk about data, gates, and validation all you want but words don’t build robustness, results do.
At this point, you’d honestly be better off saying nothing and removing this topic altogether.
Because every post you write just exposes you more.
And let’s be real if anything I said was false, you would’ve defended it immediately.
The fact that you’ve ignored it twice tells everyone everything they need to know.
Silence always betrays guilt.
