Hi Popov,

during the preparation of my new DOE comparing Single Trade vs Grid Fibonacci vs Grid Semi-Martingale, I realized there is one fundamental design point that I would like to clarify.

My objective is not to transform a successful Single Trade EA into a pure Grid system with no original exit logic. My intention is to evaluate the additional value that the Grid can bring to the original strategy by helping recover the 35–40% of trades that would normally end in a loss.

One point is already clear from my previous tests: I will remove the original Stop Loss, because otherwise the Grid may not have enough room to activate and perform its recovery function.

The key question is therefore about the original Indicator Exit and Take Profit.

For example:

* A Single Trade EA enters a position.
* The market moves against the trade and the Grid opens additional positions.
* Before the Grid reaches its Pair Closing or Grid Take Profit target, the original strategy generates an indicator exit signal or reaches its original Take Profit.

What happens in this situation?

1. Does the original indicator exit or TP close the entire Grid basket immediately?
2. Are the original exits ignored once the Grid sequence has started?
3. Is there any internal priority logic that gives control to Pair Closing and Grid management once more than one Grid position exists?

The answer is very important for the DOE design.

The purpose of my experiment is to understand whether Grid can improve a profitable EA by managing the losing trades more efficiently, not to replace the original trading logic with a completely different pure Grid system.

I would appreciate your guidance on what configuration best represents the intended use of EA Studio Plus Grid.

Thank you!
Vincenzo