• Registered: 2023-08-04
  • Posts: 34

Topic: Bulid an EA from Studio but no Trades Taken when Tested on MT4 and MT4

Hi,

I built and EA from EA Studio on USA500 M15 time frame. I downloaded it to run on MT4 Strategy Tester for M15 on broker platform but no trades is taken for the same period EA Studio ran it on.

Any clues why this is so ?

Post's attachments

Portfolio Expert USA500IDXUSD M15.mq4 28.17 kb, 1 downloads since 2023-08-16 

You don't have the permssions to download the attachments of this post.
  • Popov
  • Popov
  • Lead Developer
  • Offline
  • From: Bulgaria
  • Registered: 2006-11-30
  • Posts: 8,014

Re: Bulid an EA from Studio but no Trades Taken when Tested on MT4 and MT4

Please see the "Journal" tab of the MT's Tester.

It must be some signs there of what is going on.

Popov's Website

  • Registered: 2023-08-04
  • Posts: 34

Re: Bulid an EA from Studio but no Trades Taken when Tested on MT4 and MT4

tobeawinner wrote:

Hi,

I built and EA from EA Studio on USA500 M15 time frame. I downloaded it to run on MT4 Strategy Tester for M15 on broker platform but no trades is taken for the same period EA Studio ran it on.

Any clues why this is so ?

Will check and see what I see. Thanks for the suggestion. I'll advise soon.

  • Registered: 2023-08-04
  • Posts: 34

Re: Bulid an EA from Studio but no Trades Taken when Tested on MT4 and MT4

Popov wrote:

Please see the "Journal" tab of the MT's Tester.

It must be some signs there of what is going on.

The Journal tab is attached. I checked the platform M15 data and I see just starting from

2023.07.05,15:00,4490.25,4491.00,4488.00,4489.75,415  ends to

2023.08.16,18:15,4436.00,4449.75,4435.50,4449.25,544

My M1 starts from

2013.09.13,12:30,1686.00,1686.50,1685.25,1685.25,21

end at

2023.08.16,18:24,4449.75,4450.25,4447.75,4450.25,67

Is there a link on how to build the higher time frames from data the M1 data?

The M1 was from a separate data provider. The premium data definitely from EA Studio definitely has more M15 bard than my platform.

Think that might be the issue here.