Let me be straight with you, man and with everyone reading this.
Green months in a backtest mean nothing.
Backtests only show what worked in that specific past, not what will survive real markets.
And increasing your lot size to 3.44 on a demo account without even knowing if the system is statistically solid — is reckless, especially on a FIFO account.
You’re not validating the system; you’re amplifying the illusion.
It’s also clear you didn’t actually listen to what I said at the beginning of the week.
You’re still focusing on the smoothness of a line instead of the truth behind the data.
Look at 2018 and 2021 those are structural breaks, not “green month exceptions.”
That alone proves the curve isn’t stable.
People really need to stop treating EA Studio backtests like they’re proof of robustness.
They’re not.
EA Studio is a research tool, not a performance guarantee.
Its purpose is to help you understand the internal logic of a strategy and to apply every robustness filter possible Monte Carlo, OOS, and horizon shifts.
But even then, it’s only a starting point.
Real validation happens on demo and live data not inside the generator.
If you keep judging strategies by how “smooth” the equity line looks, you’ll keep repeating the same beginner loop no matter how many years pass.
I said it at the beginning of the week and I’ll say it again:
Stop looking for beauty in the curve start looking for truth in the data.
Because illusion doesn’t survive live execution.