Hello Jdp,

You have an annual subscription started on March 15th, 2016. This is a copy of the PayPal notification we received.

Because you haven't canceled your subscription before the due date, PayPal collected your next charge at the correct date.

We didn't offer 15th months subscription. "Three months free" means that for 12 months billing cycle you pay for only 9 months. For example, the monthly price was 19 euro at that time. The annual price should be 12 * 19 =  228 euro. However, you are billed only 149 eur, which is 79 euro less. (It looks like it was 4 months free at that time).

You canceled your subscription 3 days ago, after paying your second annual charge.

...

You have to always contact us first when you have any questions. We solve any issues immediately. However, by opening a dispute against us you damaged our good name against the payment authority. You do not leave opportunity to solve the problem between us.

...

Your FSB Pro account is currently active. It will be automatically stopped on March 15th 2018 when your last payment term expires.

Can I suggest that you work a higher time frame.

Sometimes the lure of the faster time frames can cause us some grief.

Hi dear Popov,

Are you planning to set new offers for new subscribers in the near future?

Best regards

Well, I closed the disputed case with Discover. If someone had given me details of who did what and to whom in March 2016 I would never have opened it.  In particular, I thought the offer of 3 extra months meant my original subscription was for 15 months.  Still having huge problems getting EAs that work great on FSB Pro to perform even satisfactorily when exported to either Oanda or FXCM MT4 Demo accounts.  here my latest

what I mean is, despite years of trying, using 'winning' PSB EAs exported to my two Demo mt4, I have been unable to show a 'profit' for any exported EA.  Never. Maybe the problem is that my FSB generated EAs are based upon a $2000 'initial account' and the demo MT4s are not, or because I chose a 'Leverage' of only 10, or because I chose a 'spread' of 60 because on FXCM Demo MT4 the spread sometimes gets that high at 'off hours', or because I chose first 1M, then 5M, now 15M 'periods' and Opened positions on M30, 1H conditions and 'opening Logic' conditions that are frequently M30 and 1H, etc etc.
What do you mean when you say my FSB Pro transported EA "Works"?  And if its 'profitable' on your Demo or Live MT4, can you determine, please, please, why its profitable for you and NOT profitable for me?  Is there something terribly wrong with my EA 'export' mechanism?  If by saying "it works for me", then that says to me that everything is OK up until the EA gets 'exported'.  And I have no way to check that.

thanks for taking time to address my problems.  I usually run on  both Demo MT4s all 4 [EURUSD, GBPUSD, USDCHF,& USDJPY FSB Pro exported EAs] for several weeks before concluding they're not profitable.  These are all EAs with at least $1/day[.01lot, leverage 10, w/l>.75,MC tested randomized indicator parameters, ppd>$1=75%, etc ]   I try to develop FSB EAs on both FSB Demo data and Oanda Chart data, usually with 30-40% OOS.  I tend to accept that Bill Williams knew what he was talking about re markets etc.
My concern now is not in developing profitable EAs on FSB Pro, but on figuring out why my exported EAs are never profitable on my Demo MT4s. Once I get one EA that does show a profit on a Demo MT4 more often than not then I'll conclude that all time & effort expended was worth it.

I use two data sources for generating FSB Pro EAs.  I 'test' the resultant EA with both data sources.  I obtain Oanda Chart data using the Popov ChartbyChart saving method.  I have discovered that the FSB Demo data yields a slightly different Net Balance than the Oanda Chart Data.  But my intentions are presently to establish a live acct with Oanda as being more reliable than FXCM which has changed in some ways recently that I don't fully understand. [so I closed out my FXCM live account]
So what I'm doing is generating EAs using Oanda Chart data and exporting those EAs to my Oanda MT4 Demo acct, and checking to make sure that the EA generated using FSB Demo data is virtually the same before using the Oanda EAs on FXCM Demo.  My view is that the Oanda demo MT4 is more representative of a real Live MT4  and that the FSB Demo data is more representative than the FXCM Chart data.  As I said, I've been at this for at least 3 years, and have tried lots of things. Have no trouble in concluding that I don't understand anything that happens after I export the EAs.  So that is where I think my inability to have FSB Pro profitable EAs show profits on Oanda/FXCM Demo Accounts lies.

Thanks, but I don't understand your suggestion. When I attach an EA to a 15M chart, and all my EA logic conditions are for 30M 'periods' or higher, don't those HTF logic conditions operate on the HTF data points you claim are more accurate???  I don't understand.  What does HTF 'period' mean???  Isn't it better to have  bar closing as frequent as possible.  Is it better to wait an hour to apply closing conditions than waiting 15M?

Does that mean you attach your EAs to 240M MT4 Charts, which would mean all your Entry & Exit Logic Conditions are 240M or higher, or can you attach your EAs to 15M MT4 Charts wherin your Exit logic conditions can be tested With [for example] Bar Closing every 15M?  Are your Closing Logic Conditions tested on MT4 only after 4H???I presumed it would be better to test them as soon as possible, like every 1M. Most of my EAs Entry Logic conditions are 30M or higher, but my Exit Logic Condition are 15M and I would like them to be even lower,  5M or even 1M, but that would mean having to attach My EAs to 5M or 1M MT4 charts.  That's the way my FSB Pro generated EAs  work, why don't my Exported EAs work that way on either of my MT4 Demo Accounts.  ???
PS.  As I understand FSB Pro closing logic conditions, they are tested at end of Period or Bar. until then they are tested against the last completed Bar values. So if your FSB Pro "period" is 240M, your Exit Logic Conditions are tested against values obtained during the previous Bar.  Even if you use Stop Limit exit Condition, doesn't it only move the value tested against [ in your 240M EA/Chart case] at the end of the Chart 'Bar'?? Are there FSB Pro exit Indicators that Exit on Tick Data??

If I understand "Wrong", why do so many Closing Logic Indicators say=>  "Use previous Bar value (automatically set). "  What does that statement mean if not what I said. 

And what I have been saying for months is that FSB Pro EAs, when exported and attached to a MT4 chart, open positions that change the Account "Equity" up and down, but only seem to change the Account Balance - if at all - negatively. 

For the past several years I have not had a single positive [winning] MT4 Demo Account.  None! Many, many winning FSB Pro EAs but No winning MT4 accounts.

Can someone move this exchange to a more appropriate 'thread'???

There is every reason for many, maybe most, closing Logic positions to say that during bar execution, there is no way to know what the high will turn out to be, or the Lo, or the average or the close.  So the EA HAS TO use the values from the previous bar.  I have understood that for 5-6 years!!!  What did I write that gave the impression I didn't?  What I've been saying is that it seems to me that, for closure, it is a good idea to have the bar interval as short as possible.  It doesn't hurt to have your closing logic conditions checked against the data as often as possible. Does it???

The idea of checking the price as often as possible is right, in a way...... , however, trying to cut things so close is going to cause you grief.
because there are far more bars on a 5 minute chart than on a 4 hour chart...... the fluctuations are much greater, the data points are not as good on the 5 minute.....
Your oscillators will be changing value much more frequently and you can get trapped by periods of chop.
However, some people are determined to trade the fast charts......, myself, I prefer fewer trades with more accuracy.
My theory is that super simple works best.