Can we not control this by using take profit and controlling the number of trades?

the idea is the stability of strategy always overlooked and it is one of main reasons that traders get losses

Lets say you have a business gives you a high returns '' high profitable strategy which FSB can find '' but that business generate that huge profit from smaller number of transactions and the rest of transactions gives you a very small profits  and lets say you missed one or two of the highly profitable transactions for any reason !!  this will dramatically damage the profits of your business  Right?! 

And if we have a business with transactions more or less give the same expected returns '' the profits well distributed allover your transactions  !!  this is what i mean by stability  so if we have filter in criteria window & sorting  this will gives us high return , stable expected returns strategies

strategy 1

Its Stable , predictable returns and safe to follow '' the flactuations between points minimum , no time gaps

strategy 3 this strategy is double other three strategies in points  BUT in my opinion seams ugly , risky , unpredictable returns , frustrating strategy

The idea looks like squeezed bell shape curve from top this will lead to the lower parts of the bell curve to be increased ''  its a modified bell shape of profits , trades distribution

And the ultimate shape of the squeezed bell shape will be strategy No 4

two winning trades > 40% of all profits sum  (total winning trades =27 )

With the older version we did not have adequate control of the exits, ie take profit and stop loss.. so we could not prevent those big trades by limiting the size.

Much different now.