<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Number of Ascended and Collection not Match]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/7985/" />
	<updated>2019-09-24T13:04:55Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/7985/number-of-ascended-and-collection-not-match/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Number of Ascended and Collection not Match]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/57226/#p57226" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I personally prefer variant (b).</p><p>Please see these topics for more info regarding Walk Forward: <a href="https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/7907/walk-forward-internals-explained/">Walk Forward Internals Explained</a>.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-09-24T13:04:55Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/57226/#p57226</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Number of Ascended and Collection not Match]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/57222/#p57222" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Popov wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Please check the info in the Collection&#039;s Records Stats.</p><p>It is possible to have Resolved correlations</p></blockquote></div><p>Thanks Mr Popov for your quick reply.<br />Resolved correlated means similar strategies, right? <br />I just noticed that I have 126 pushed total strategies and 124 are resolved correlated. So, I just have wait and let the reactor do its job.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Popov wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Offtopic:<br />- Walk-Forward Validation my not work well after the Optimizer. The reason is that once the strategy is optimized for the full data set, it is unlikely to find a good result when optimizing in chunks.</p><p>- There is something wrong in the WF and the Monte Carlo settings. The may not validate 100% of the strategies. If you think, it is correct, simply disable WF and Monte Carlo to reduce the Global warming.</p></blockquote></div><p>Does it mean I only need either one:<br />(a) Full Data optimization + Monte Carlo validation<br />(b) Walk Forward validation + Monte Carlo validation (without optimization)</p><p>How about Walk Forward optimization + Walk Forward validation + Monte Carlo validation?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[seanFRF]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/11551/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-09-24T12:16:23Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/57222/#p57222</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Number of Ascended and Collection not Match]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/57216/#p57216" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Offtopic:<br /> - Walk-Forward Validation my not work well after the Optimizer. The reason is that once the strategy is optimized for the full data set, it is unlikely to find a good result when optimizing in chunks.</p><p>- There is something wrong in the WF and the Monte Carlo settings. The may not validate 100% of the strategies. If you think, it is correct, simply disable WF and Monte Carlo to reduce the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming">Global warming</a>.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-09-24T05:45:46Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/57216/#p57216</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Number of Ascended and Collection not Match]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/57215/#p57215" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Please check the info in the Collection&#039;s Records Stats.</p><p>It is possible to have Resolved correlations:</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://image-holder.forexsb.com/store/ea-studio-collection-records-stats-resolved-correlations.png" alt="https://image-holder.forexsb.com/store/ea-studio-collection-records-stats-resolved-correlations.png" /></span></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-09-24T05:40:29Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/57215/#p57215</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Number of Ascended and Collection not Match]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/57213/#p57213" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>After leaving the Reactor working overnight, I found that there are 77 strategies that passed through Monte Carlo Validation but only 2 are in the Collection. Is that the 75 strategies are similar to the other 2?<br />Anyone has any idea about this?<br /><a href="https://imge.to/i/vTRYr2"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://b.imge.to/2019/09/24/vTRYr2.png" alt="https://b.imge.to/2019/09/24/vTRYr2.png" /></span></a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[seanFRF]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/11551/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-09-24T04:47:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/57213/#p57213</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
