<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — sharpe ratio]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/9941/sharpe-ratio/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/9941/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in sharpe ratio.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 12:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: sharpe ratio]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/82669/#p82669</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s the key! You&#039;d be impressed by how well that validation Mr. Popov mentions works.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Popov wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Sharpe Ratio represents the how big is the profit relatively to the balance and the profit volatility.</p><p>Simply said, the Sharpe Ratio will be higher when a strategy makes higher consistent profit.<br />A reason for low Sharpe ratio is a big variation of the profit and loss size.</p><p>Besides the trading rules, the strategy performance greatly depends on the commission, swaps, and spreads.</p><p>I would not put too much attention to the stats metrics.<br />For me the most important criteria evaluating a strategy is to make a profit on new data, no mater if it is on backtest, real or demo trading.</p></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (kitomc)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 12:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/82669/#p82669</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: sharpe ratio]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/82668/#p82668</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sharpe Ratio represents the how big is the profit relatively to the balance and the profit volatility.</p><p>Simply said, the Sharpe Ratio will be higher when a strategy makes higher consistent profit.<br />A reason for low Sharpe ratio is a big variation of the profit and loss size.</p><p>Besides the trading rules, the strategy performance greatly depends on the commission, swaps, and spreads.</p><p>I would not put too much attention to the stats metrics.<br />For me the most important criteria evaluating a strategy is to make a profit on new data, no mater if it is on backtest, real or demo trading.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 10:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/82668/#p82668</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[sharpe ratio]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/82667/#p82667</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear all</p><p>I made an EA with EA studio. The EA profits $3536 and sharpe ratio 0.16 with premium historical data. <br />I run the same EA with different hitorical data in&nbsp; the same period. Historical data-1 gave $4713 sharpe ratio 4.14 and Historical data-2 yielded $6364 sharpe ratio 5.60. Why EA studio sharpe ratio is too low?<br />any comments I appreciate, thank you</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (moonb123)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 09:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/82667/#p82667</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
