You are right,
Monte Carlo keeps the SL and TP instact. It was my original design.

I'll think of adding SL and TP variations.

Thank you for your suggestion for improvement!

First of all I love your software. It is really great. So much work and thought went into this. When I saw Monte Carlo implementation I had to buy it.

Many models I generate are robust robots which use "Do not exit" indicator. This is good. They are very simple and compress information.
In this case SL and TP become simple exit strategy and should be tested as parameters during Monte Carlo procedure. But I have noticed that these models are sensitive to SL and TP changes. I assume current Monet Carlo implementation does not take them into account. Is that true? If so, could you please implement it ASAP ?

All the best,