<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — Incubation Win Rate and KPIs]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/9695/incubation-win-rate-and-kpis/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/9695/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Incubation Win Rate and KPIs.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 05:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Incubation Win Rate and KPIs]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79322/#p79322</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello Blaiserboy,</p><p>Did not get your question, what should I do with&nbsp; FXBlue?<br />I am not talking about the ea performances, these KPIs are one level up.</p><p>I am measuring the efficiency of the reactor process, basically how many EA in incubation (demo) becomes active and how many of them are in profit. </p><p>Questions are :</p><p>- is there any setup of the reactor which produce an higher win rate (EAs active/incubatated, In profit/active) ?<br />- is there any setting negatively affecting this outcome ?</p><p>Hope is clearer now.<br />Thx<br />Vincenzo</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Vincenzo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 05:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79322/#p79322</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Incubation Win Rate and KPIs]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79318/#p79318</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Can you not pick preferred results from FXBlue?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Blaiserboy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 19:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79318/#p79318</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Incubation Win Rate and KPIs]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79179/#p79179</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Anyone willing to share this kind of experience ?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Vincenzo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79179/#p79179</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Incubation Win Rate and KPIs]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79070/#p79070</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello Everyone,</p><p>I have defined some KPIs (key performance indicators) to measure the consistency and efficiency of the EA creation process. </p><p>In few easy word, once developed a strategy and created a certain numbers of EAs, I am measuring the following dimensions into the incubation process :</p><p>- numbers of EA incubated (e.g. 100)<br />- numbers of EA which become active after half of the planned incubation time (e.g. after 6 weeks 48 EA have at least a trade done)<br />- numbers of EAs in profit after half of the planned incubation time.</p><p>I will also collect the same data at the end of the incubation, so then T1 corresponds to 6 weeks and T2 to 12 weeks.</p><p>Actually I see the following :</p><p>After 6 weeks (T1) I have on average 48% of the EAs active and 59% of the in profit.</p><p>But, if I drill the T1 KPIs down to the single strategy I have in incubation, then I see a very wide range:</p><p>From&nbsp; 9% to 100% active EAs.<br />From 14% to 90%&nbsp; in profit Es.</p><p>Is any one experiencing the same ?<br />Is any one analyzing these kind of performances and understanding the route causes behind so wide ranges?</p><p>Regards<br />Vincenzo</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Vincenzo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 05:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79070/#p79070</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
