<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — Deviating results in backtesting]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/9492/deviating-results-in-backtesting/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/9492/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Deviating results in backtesting.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2023 05:01:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Deviating results in backtesting]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/75610/#p75610</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&gt; I resolved the issue by setting the commission per lot correctly when using data export.</p><p>Good job!</p><p>You can also do it in EA Studio in the &quot;Data&quot; -&gt; &quot;Symbol Settings&quot; tab.<br />Select the desired symbol and change the &quot;Settings source&quot; to &quot;Custom symbol settings&quot;.<br />You can play with the values to see how they affect the backtest.<br />You can always return back to the original settings.<br />The symbols with overwritten parameters are marked with an asterisk.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2023 05:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/75610/#p75610</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Deviating results in backtesting]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/75513/#p75513</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE:</p><p>Thanks for replying so quick, Popov!</p><br /><p>I resolved the issue by setting the commission per lot correct when using data export. Newbie mistake.<br />All results now correspond between EA Studio and MT.</p><p>Wow, what a tool!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Averell)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 11:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/75513/#p75513</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Deviating results in backtesting]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/75491/#p75491</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Please share your Expert Advisor, and we will test it.</p><p>In the meantime, you can compare the deals between EA Studio and MT.</p><p>The easiest way to do it is to use the charts.<br />In the EA Studio&#039;s Indicator Chart, you can go to the previous or next deal using <strong>Ctrl + arrow</strong>.</p><p>You can also use the Journal to see where the trades deviate.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 04:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/75491/#p75491</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Deviating results in backtesting]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/75489/#p75489</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi.</p><p>I have uploaded history from ICMarkets to Expert Advisor Studio.<br />Meaning Expert Advisor Studio and ICMarkets MT5 backtester are using the same data.<br />However when I apply the strategy to the MT5 backtester I`m not getting the same results as the generator, and mostly only around 50% trades taken. Trading dates are the same.</p><p>Two last pair I noticed it are GBPJPY and EURGBP.</p><p>Any idea why?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Averell)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 20:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/75489/#p75489</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
