<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — Evaluate the quality of historical data]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/9473/evaluate-the-quality-of-historical-data/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/9473/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Evaluate the quality of historical data.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 14:08:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Evaluate the quality of historical data]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/75299/#p75299</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>EA studio offers some data analysis but Is this really enough to distinguish good from bad data?<br />I don&#039;t really know to how to properly evaluate historical data but the analysis from EA Studio feels very basic.</p><p>And somehow my data from IC Markets gives me better results then the Premium data even though I have a much bigger time horizon with IC Markets data.</p><p>Is there perhaps a tool that can do a more sophisticated analysis of historical data?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (johannesq354)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 14:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/75299/#p75299</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
