<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — "*.FXT files "  and Backtesting.]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/8473/fxt-files-and-backtesting/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/8473/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in "*.FXT files "  and Backtesting..]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA["*.FXT files "  and Backtesting.]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/61383/#p61383</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The ideal is to back-test using the broker server data.</p><p>The&nbsp; data that is downloaded&nbsp; automatically form MT4 comes from Meta-trader&#039;s server NOT the dealer server.<br />SO this files are converted automatically and internally in MT4 under c:\\ ***\tester\history , and the form of the file is &quot;.FXT&quot;.</p><p>My question then is..Any backt-esting&nbsp; done in MT4 will not replicate the dealers data but only the Meta-trader data. So the Back-testing is lacking reality in this case. Correct?</p><p>In FSB we can update the Data with the real data form the broker and run back-test, the back test using FSB will be accurate in real life and the back test in MT4 will only somehow replicate the result with multiples errors, that is my understanding.</p><p>I need to re-confirm these analysis to avoid future mistakes and be cautious about the back-testing in MT4 </p><p>Please advise.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Maximus1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/61383/#p61383</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
