I´ve just compared some of my last live trades today with the EA Studio backtest (feeding it the same data of course), I´ve got a perfect match down to a few points on the entry and exit prices (spread differences and slippage - just normal). If your strategies pass the mentioned MC tests, you should be fine (also in terms of starting bar, don´t forget that).

My Acceptance Criteria in Reactor mode totally depends on what I am looking for and how many years of data I am using. In general here is what I use *most* of the time on my 32 years H1 data set (all pairs):

Minimum R-Squared: 80 (want at least to have a *somewhat* acceptable curve in the initial strategy before handing it over to the Optimizer, as I don´t want to waste CPU power on the Optimizer for strategies that anyway will fail even after the Optimizer as their initial stage is too bad right from the start)

Minimum Trades: 1500 (now that could be much too much if using < 32 years of data, but for my huge set it´s the minimum I want to see because anything lower is not really statistically relevant)

Minimum Backtest Quality: 99 (obvious, right?)

That´s it already, nothing special.

geektrader, which Broker do you use? I'm looking for a good quality data broker and it seems to me that you have a very good one...

I checked the trade session of second broker I show.The trading time begins at 00:05 as you said.

My some orders, I mean to lated opening order of first broker in  strategy tester. I'm sorry for unclear question.
for the first broker,It begins at 00:00. The only one reason I know is requote. think like me?

Your second demo offers perfect - I repeat - perfect execution times and that leads me to believe your first demo broker is even below an ordinary bucket shop standard.

Therefore, pick your brokers carefully, teach yourself about trade sessions as well - real Asian session kicks off with Tokyo, before that it is a low liquidity/high spread borefest if you get my drift.

P.S. And always familiarize yourself with the terms and conditions your brokers offer you, an illustrating screenshot below.

The result-testing in FSB

Backtesting result in mt4

Demo trade result

Demo trade result (The another broker)

I attach the strategy in this post. I'd like to know anyone will have the same problem like me?

And yes I do, even on 32 years of H1 data - having ~4000+ trades there, so /3, you should be able to get 1000 as a minimum for 10 years too. All my strategies (you can see them in that post) have a stop loss of max 60 pips. Most are in the 3X pips range. I don´t like strategies with a big stop loss. Shows that the entry (or exit) is too inaccurate and the exploited edge too weak. Wouldn´t trade those personally.

I played with eastudio and i find out that.

You use e.g 10 years backtest data and want 1000 trades than i never find good strategies when use Stop loss.
So i find out higher minimum count of trades need high stop loss to get good strategies.

I only get good strategies when i use minimum 200 trades. Maybe i do something wrong. But i never found strategie for example stop loss 50-100 pips. Only with small number of trades.

My Acceptance Criteria in Reactor mode totally depends on what I am looking for and how many years of data I am using. In general here is what I use *most* of the time on my 32 years H1 data set (all pairs):

Minimum R-Squared: 80 (want at least to have a *somewhat* acceptable curve in the initial strategy before handing it over to the Optimizer, as I don´t want to waste CPU power on the Optimizer for strategies that anyway will fail even after the Optimizer as their initial stage is too bad right from the start)

Minimum Trades: 1500 (now that could be much too much if using < 32 years of data, but for my huge set it´s the minimum I want to see because anything lower is not really statistically relevant)

Minimum Backtest Quality: 99 (obvious, right?)

That´s it already, nothing special.

@Michael1
I think my problem is as geektrader mention, either spread or maybe out of "sync" because of the starting bar sensitivity and possibly the following chain of events thereafter

@geektrader
I would be happy if u could share your view
what settings for the "Acceptance criteria" is recommended when starting in reactor mode?

I’ll be opening an account with another broker unfortunately