<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/7276/balance-line-deviation-incorrect/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/7276/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Balance Line Deviation incorrect?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 01:16:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/63972/#p63972</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p><p>just tested the latest FSB Pro and see this still hasn´t been added or adjust, almost 5 years after reporting it. Is this still planned?</p><p>Thank you.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (geektrader)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 01:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/63972/#p63972</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53506/#p53506</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, but balance line deviation has been removed and stagnation does not really say much, the strategy can still have long almost-flat-periods where there was just a gain of $1. The only reliable measure would be a working r squared of the equity curve, but Popov is working on it :-)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (geektrader)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 07:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53506/#p53506</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/52633/#p52633</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Popov,</p><p>just wondering about this one too - is it going to come before the end of the year still? Haven´t found it in the latest updates...</p><p>Thanks so much :-)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (geektrader)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 03:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/52633/#p52633</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50994/#p50994</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Haha OK, good stuff, keep up the good work <img src="https://forexsb.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> Thanks!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (geektrader)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 22:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50994/#p50994</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50966/#p50966</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is. I have currently 27 tasks in my EA Studio ToDo list and work on them. It is realistically to say that I&#039;ll complete most of them before the end of the year.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 04:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50966/#p50966</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50961/#p50961</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mr. Popov,</p><p>can you please be so kind to to let us know if this implementation is still planned?</p><p>Thank you.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (geektrader)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2018 20:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50961/#p50961</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50564/#p50564</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Popov wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I may use formula similar to the one I use for the Correlation analysis. Than we can have 100% if the balance line is a straight line.</p></blockquote></div><p>Dear Mr. Popov,</p><p>any news on that yet? I would really like to see this in EA studio to be able to use the correlation for the equity curve and how much it deviates from a straight line. Thanks so much :-)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (geektrader)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 20:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50564/#p50564</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50563/#p50563</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is exactly it :-) Does it work now?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (geektrader)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 20:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50563/#p50563</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50520/#p50520</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I saved the original .cs file with a new name and gave the new file the original file name.&nbsp; Is this the correct procedure?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Freebird)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 20:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50520/#p50520</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50515/#p50515</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Check if the &quot;Load custom account stats&quot; is enabled.</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://s7.postimg.cc/itooswnkr/screenshot_217.png" alt="https://s7.postimg.cc/itooswnkr/screenshot_217.png" /></span></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 14:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50515/#p50515</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50501/#p50501</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>All,</p><p>I put Geektrader&#039;s AccountStatistics.cs file in this folder (C:\Program Files\Forex Strategy Builder Pro\User Files\Code) and restarted FSB but have not noticed a change.&nbsp; Is there something else I must do?</p><p>Should I see a change in the Account Statistics section or the Acceptance Criteria, or somewhere else?</p><p>This is my first time tweaking this.&nbsp; I&#039;m only a 2 month FSB user.</p><p>Thanks.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Freebird)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 20:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50501/#p50501</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50155/#p50155</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guys,</p><p>I´ve finally gotten around to implement this in the way that I need it (almost). Please try the attached &quot;AccountStatistics.cs&quot; file. The &quot;Filter non-linear balance pattern&quot; in the Acceptance Criterias now uses the average % deviation from a perfect straight line taken from ALL trades the system made and WITHOUT taking the initial balance into account (like it was before). </p><p>The &quot;checkpoints&quot; it uses for that are automatically adjusted to the amount of total trades within each system instead of a previously fixed amount of 100. So this metric will now always be independent from the starting balance and lot-size that the system trades (if fixed lots are being used). Give it a try and use a value of &quot;30&quot; for the &quot;Filter non-linear balance pattern&quot; and you will only get systems with a very straight net profit growth-line.&nbsp; Of course you can tighten this further (or relax it), if needed. Just give it a try and you´ll see how this is different to how it was implemented before (no more bias to prefer systems with few profit but high stability, starting balance makes no more difference, lot-size makes no more difference either) ...</p><p>While at it, I noticed that FSB Pro does not display the Total Trades in the Account Statistics, but only the Executed Orders. I´ve added that in my opinion very important missing metric to the Account Statistics as well.</p><p>Good luck creating stable systems ;-)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (geektrader)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50155/#p50155</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/49979/#p49979</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Popov wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I may use formula similar to the one I use for the Correlation analysis. Than we can have 100% if the balance line is a straight line.</p></blockquote></div><p>Any news about that new metric already? It would be fantastic to have it just the way you´ve described it there (100% if straight, etc......). Would really love to have this one ASAP :-) :-)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (geektrader)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/49979/#p49979</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/49765/#p49765</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://sc.mogicons.com/c/192.jpg" alt="https://sc.mogicons.com/c/192.jpg" /></span></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (geektrader)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/49765/#p49765</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/49763/#p49763</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I may use formula similar to the one I use for the Correlation analysis. Than we can have 100% if the balance line is a straight line.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 22:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/49763/#p49763</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
