<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — Monte Carlo Confidence table]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/7238/monte-carlo-confidence-table/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/7238/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Monte Carlo Confidence table.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:23:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Monte Carlo Confidence table]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/49369/#p49369</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi trader, when we come to the Monte Carlo test in the EA Studio, we msut talk also about the Confidence table. So I have read many different recommendations which Monte Carlo Confidence Table value is worth to be teste further.</p><p>So the most recommendations are to skip the strategy with MC test when the 95% Return / DD is less the 50% of the orignal value. </p><p>That the strategy is worthy to be tested further the 95 % Return / DD value should be 70% of the original value.</p><p>Can that be true? Are you use the same recommendations?</p><p>Regards Chris</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (ChristianS)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/49369/#p49369</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
