<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — Enter Once Strategies too optimistic results]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/6970/enter-once-strategies-too-optimistic-results/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/6970/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Enter Once Strategies too optimistic results.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 15:19:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Enter Once Strategies too optimistic results]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46830/#p46830</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for answer. Firstly I used DucasCopy data, and Comparator test showed nothing bad... Lesson: always test on few different data sets, and look in Comparator <img src="https://forexsb.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> But firstly, always get suspicious when you see very good results.&nbsp; Have a nice day!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Irmantas)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 15:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46830/#p46830</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Enter Once Strategies too optimistic results]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46829/#p46829</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It happens that the strategy may take a great advantage of exploiting the interpolation algorithm. I call that algorithm-fitting. This problem appeared in the first year of creating and testing FSB. The only solution I found was to add different algorithms that interpolate the bars in different way.</p><p>The Comparator tool calculates a strategy by using all selected algorithms and plots the result on a chart.&nbsp; </p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://s1.postimg.org/1hcazdoo8v/screenshot_9.png" alt="https://s1.postimg.org/1hcazdoo8v/screenshot_9.png" /></span></p><p>We see that this strategy is a perfect example of exploitation of the Pessimistic algorithm. We see it shows the best result. Shame for it <img src="https://forexsb.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" />.</p><p>Fortunately the backtest shows ambiguous bars, which is a clear sign that there is something wrong. However it is possible to have a case for algorithm-fitting without ambiguous bars.</p><p>It is always a good idea to use the Comparator. </p><p>In that connection imagine how the MetaTrader users detect such cases.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 15:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46829/#p46829</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Enter Once Strategies too optimistic results]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46828/#p46828</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Blaiserboy, it seems you do not read what I write here. No walk forward will solve bogus indicator or some strange mesh up with different data or interpolation methods. It is very dangerous to get too optimistic results and to clear things out is a must.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Irmantas)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 15:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46828/#p46828</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Enter Once Strategies too optimistic results]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46827/#p46827</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>you can use filters to ensure you have good stuff.... and you can also use walk forward</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Blaiserboy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46827/#p46827</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Enter Once Strategies too optimistic results]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46826/#p46826</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Even more strangely, with different data, good results remain with all interpolation methods... <img src="https://forexsb.com/forum/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /> So there is some big confusion. On my broker data, good results is destroyed when changing from &quot;pessimistic&quot; to &quot;optimistic&quot;, but with Ducascopy data it remains all good. Where is a problem?</p><p><a href="https://postimg.org/image/1d1wbiegob/"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://s1.postimg.org/1d1wbiegob/problem.png" alt="https://s1.postimg.org/1d1wbiegob/problem.png" /></span></a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Irmantas)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46826/#p46826</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Enter Once Strategies too optimistic results]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46825/#p46825</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well it seems changing Method from &quot;Pessimistic&quot; to &quot;Optimistic&quot; destroys profits. hmm, should it not be opposite way? Well, I guess there is no mistakes in indicators, just ambiguous bars playing out strangely.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Irmantas)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46825/#p46825</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Enter Once Strategies too optimistic results]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46824/#p46824</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />I generated very good looking strategy, however I think it is too good to be true <img src="https://forexsb.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> There is nothing magic about &quot;enter once per week&quot; on the round number. Similar results on EUR USD too. Changing that &quot;one per week&quot; good results disappear. Also mt4 tester do not show similar backtest. Can someone please check these indicators for mistakes? I believe there should be one. Or there is no mistakes and it is real holy grail? <img src="https://forexsb.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> THANKS!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Irmantas)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46824/#p46824</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
