<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — Ambiguous Bars]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/6818/ambiguous-bars/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/6818/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Ambiguous Bars.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 18:07:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ambiguous Bars]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46684/#p46684</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>wasusolake0123 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>How to fix Ambiguous bars?</p></blockquote></div><p>User guide tells the following:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>you can reduce the number of ambiguous bars and to make the test more reliable by switching on the Testing → Automatic Scan option. It will force Forex Strategy Builder to use all available intrabar data for better bar interpolation.</p></blockquote></div><p>And update data including lower timeframes.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (footon)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 18:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46684/#p46684</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ambiguous Bars]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46681/#p46681</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>How to fix Ambiguous bars?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (wasusolake0123)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46681/#p46681</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ambiguous Bars]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/45499/#p45499</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Generally we want zero Ambiguous Bars because, depending on the strategy, sometimes even a smaller number of Ambiguous Bars leads to a big difference between the different interpolation methods.</p><p>The backtesting algorithm is designed produce lower output profit (provided that you use the Pessimistic method) and in most of the cases if a strategy shows a good backtest, it is reliable enough to be traded. However, it is possible to find a strategy that exploits the particular interpolation method in order to show an overestimated result. We detect such cases with the help of the <a href="https://forexsb.com/wiki/fsbpro_guide/comparator">Comparator</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2017 04:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/45499/#p45499</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ambiguous Bars]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/45498/#p45498</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I assume that the Acceptance Criteria for &quot;Max Ambiguous Bars&quot; should be changed according to a percentage of the total number of bars you are testing over?</p><p>What is an appropriate percentage of total bars to set this value at? Does the answer change when you are using only IS versus using both IS and OOS?</p><p>For example, if I generate over 100,000 bars, what would a good value be?</p><p>ThanX!<br />John</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (qattack)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2017 01:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/45498/#p45498</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
