Does that mean you attach your EAs to 240M MT4 Charts, which would mean all your Entry & Exit Logic Conditions are 240M or higher, or can you attach your EAs to 15M MT4 Charts wherin your Exit logic conditions can be tested With [for example] Bar Closing every 15M?  Are your Closing Logic Conditions tested on MT4 only after 4H???I presumed it would be better to test them as soon as possible, like every 1M. Most of my EAs Entry Logic conditions are 30M or higher, but my Exit Logic Condition are 15M and I would like them to be even lower,  5M or even 1M, but that would mean having to attach My EAs to 5M or 1M MT4 charts.

Hello to all

Maybe that's the problem,
It does not make sense to impose a TF for the opening or a TF for the closure, if there are no confirming statistics.
for opening it is possible to use a high TF (4H, 1D) to know the trend, a minor one to know the daily trend and an indicator with even minor trend to enter the correct direction of the trend.

But Tf 15, 30, 1 H, when used together are not indicative of trends but are at risk of false accelerations and false breaks.

FSB can be improved and it probably will be,
but his task is to look for a set of operations that give positive sum over time, it can not tell whether a strategy is rational.

I'm looking at your strategy EurUsd 122,
uses around 4 indicators

AO indicates the acceleration of the 30 ', then the risk of false signals
GO indicates the trend of 3 Moving averages,

AO 30 'is always late,
GO should confirm that an AO signal, probably indicates a signal that is ending.
Perhaps it would be better to reverse them and work them, perhaps adding a filter in the direction of the most important trends
Using Envelopes for closing does not make sense, use 2 Envelopes is absurd.

Your strategy with the default data FSB shows me:
SQN = 0.78 ???????
Average HPR = 0.05 ??????
Stagnation of 590 days, up from 15 Tf '??? with 0.03 lot ???
PF = 1.19 (account closure)
etc. etc

This is a strategy to trash, instead you can better meet the indicators and TF.
You do not have to see FSB (like other similar software) as a shortcut, but as a tool on which to work (much) to have a different solution !!!
Good trading

What did I write that gave the impression I didn't?

Post 18, for example.

I don't understand you. It looks like you are trying to overcome a wall that isn't there. Am I right if I say that you don't really grasp the way FSB works?

If I understand "Wrong", why do so many Closing Logic Indicators say=>  "Use previous Bar value (automatically set). "  What does that statement mean if not what I said.

Why shouldn't they say it? Do you have some real examples where PBV is working the wrong way? Before making any statements, you could study your strategy a bit, it would take less than 5 minutes to do so, you're experienced FSB user after all.

If it says "automatically set", it is automatically set. Controlling PBV is the job of FSB, and you can see it yourself from the indi window whether it is turned on or not. And verify it on chart if it works as intended.

And what I have been saying for months is that FSB Pro EAs, when exported and attached to a MT4 chart, open positions that change the Account "Equity" up and down, but only seem to change the Account Balance - if at all - negatively. 

For the past several years I have not had a single positive [winning] MT4 Demo Account.  None! Many, many winning FSB Pro EAs but No winning MT4 accounts.

Can someone move this exchange to a more appropriate 'thread'???

As I understand FSB Pro closing logic conditions, they are tested at end of Period or Bar. until then they are tested against the last completed Bar values. So if your FSB Pro "period" is 240M, your Exit Logic Conditions are tested against values obtained during the previous Bar.  Even if you use Stop Limit exit Condition, doesn't it only move the value tested against [ in your 240M EA/Chart case] at the end of the Chart 'Bar'?? Are there FSB Pro exit Indicators that Exit on Tick Data??

You understand wrong.

Can you provide something to make your statement clear and substantiated?

HTF  higher time frame

Hope that helps.

Lower timer frames are more volatile and logic is being adjusted more frequently.

Backtestsed strategies are not guaranteed to work in live markets.

Best to use higher time frames as they have better data points.

you said earlier, that you have 2 demo accounts (FXCM & OANDA)
then you said lately that you use on FSB 2 data sources FSB_DEMO source AND  OANDA_DATA sources.

in my little experience, each broker has his own data sources and you will not have identical result if you used different sources

try this, import to FSB the data from FXCM and make your strategy, then export it to be used only on FXCM DEMO ACCOUNT...you will definitely have the same results as FSB...i had this problem once
you simply need to differentiate between brokers data...they are not the same

Now I see that you apparently have a problem with overall performance, profitability in other words. At what point do you decide that a strat is a losing one? After a day, after a week, after 2 consecutive losses?

The first lesson in algo trading is that profitable backtest does not guarantee similar future performance. And one cannot hold the software accountable if a strat turns out to be a loser. The best in this case would be to re-work and re-learn your approach to strat development. Formulate your approach and principles concisely and make a simple test: cut your dataset into 2 (a ratio of 4:1), develop 10 or more strats as per your principles on the first set of data and then put your strats on that last bit of data for validation. How do they fare on that new piece of data? What's the success rate? Usually it's a break-even, meaning 50% of strats are profitable. So, if the success rate is 50 and below, your strat developing methodology is no good, the problem is in you! If more than 50% of strats are profitable on that new set of data, your approach is good! Keep up the work and fine tune it.

Anyhow, that is my advice and one way of looking at things. I'm sure there are many other ways. Hope this helps to nudge your thoughts a bit.