I believe that it is of extreme importance a greater quality in modeling tests. As for example in MT4, with a 99% modeling, already here in FSB my biggest modeling was Scanned MQ 57.72%. Downloaded the historical data by TrueFX and still can't get a better modeling.

Unless the Scanned MQ, differs from MT4 modeling, wanting to believe that the first is better than the second.

Hi,

Just wondering, if one is able to get positive and consistent results in most of the timeframes from both interpolation methods, optimistic and pessimistic, does that mean that the system has a very high profitability chance in live trading? If not, what would cause it to fail?

If the above is true, but has a large amount of ambiguous bars, 2250 out of 20000 bars. Will it still be accurate?

And, is it safe to assume that both 'random' and nearest' are about the same(priority in closing nearest position) and that it is fine to remove 'random' when using the comparator to calculate the average balance?

thanks 

You should pay attention how many trades there are compared to ambig. bars, if you have say 1500 trades and 2250 ambig. bars, then it doesn't look good, it means the backtest is not to be trusted completely. If you change interpolation methods, and the number of ambig. bars is not reduced, it is very difficult to state whether the strat works or not. It is always a good idea to test it live on a demo account.

Just wondering, if one is able to get positive and consistent results in most of the timeframes from both interpolation methods, optimistic and pessimistic, does that mean that the system has a very high profitability chance in live trading? If not, what would cause it to fail?

If the above is true, but has a large amount of ambiguous bars, 2250 out of 20000 bars. Will it still be accurate?

And, is it safe to assume that both 'random' and nearest' are about the same(priority in closing nearest position) and that it is fine to remove 'random' when using the comparator to calculate the average balance?

thanks 

Hello, thank you very very much by program.
I am using FXCM plataform to trade
I wondering there is some way that I can saved the strategy in extension file program "lua" to be used to FXCM plataform, or any other extension file program I can used on it.
Thank you

FXCM has Metatrader

There's no such logic in FSB for this part: (MA2 == MA3). Does it has to equal precisely? Apart from that, use Moving Average Crossover indicator, logic "is higher/lower".

Hi,
My mean is equal logic .
Thanks

Time Frame = M15

MA1 = MA36 ; Smoothed ; Close ; shift =0 ;
MA2 =MA36 ; Linear Weighted ; Close , Shift =0 ;
MA3=MA8  ; Simple ; Close ; Shift = 0 ;
MA4=MA8  ; Simple ; Close ; Shift = 1 ;

Tp =10 ; Sl =10

Buy Signal :
IF (MA1 < MA2) and (MA4 < MA2) And (MA2 == MA3)

Sell Signal :
IF (MA1 > MA2) and (MA4>MA2 ) And (MA2 == MA3)

Thanks

can i get some help here ? feeling frustrated.

i would like to build with these logics. is it possible ?

FAST EMA CROSSES SLOW EMA VALUE GOING UPWARD = CLOSE PREVIOUS TRADE AND GO LONG

SLOW EMA CROSSES FAST EMA VALUE GOING DOWNWARD = CLOSE PREVIOUS TRADE AND GO SHORT

TAKE PROFIT - 100 PIPS
STOP LOSS - NIL

thanks.

A same direction signal - Does nothing
An opposite direction signal - Does nothing
Permanent Stop Loss - 2000
Permanent Take Profit - None

[Opening Point of the Position]
Previous High Low
     Enter long at the previous low
     Base price  -  High and Low
     Vertical shift  -  0

[Closing Point of the Position]
Previous High Low
     Exit long at the previous high
     Base price  -  High and Low
     Vertical shift  -  0

Second one needs more defining in terms of direction, because it's not possible to open opposite direction trades in FSB simultaenously.