<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — Strange behavior of a strategy]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/4822/strange-behavior-of-a-strategy/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/4822/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Strange behavior of a strategy.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 May 2014 19:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Strange behavior of a strategy]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25280/#p25280</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Popov, thank you for your explaining of this (odd) behavior. Having your explanation on hands, which shows your way of thinking to find a solution, allows me now to play with numbers and look at the journal - all this will help me to understand the inner working of FSB and FSB Pro better.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Herd)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2014 19:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25280/#p25280</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Strange behavior of a strategy]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25279/#p25279</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Everything with the calculations is normal.</p><p>The problem is that the position opens very large amount comparing to the initial account value - up to 19 lots.<br />When the initial account is exactly 300 Eur - the positions pass just below the limits. If you increase the account to 301 Eur. Order No 929 on bar No 563 is canceled because it goes to add 0.88 lots to a position of 19.18 lots - total amount = 20.06, which is above the limit of max 20 lots.</p><p>When the initial account is 300 eur, this order is not canceled and FSB sets a new SL/TP. This makes the difference.</p><p>Set Account representation in points, if you wan to compare the values easily.</p><p><a href="http://postimg.org/image/k90b61ojb/"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://s7.postimg.org/k90b61ojb/2014_05_31_19_37_06.jpg" alt="http://s7.postimg.org/k90b61ojb/2014_05_31_19_37_06.jpg" /></span></a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2014 16:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25279/#p25279</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Strange behavior of a strategy]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25277/#p25277</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The first discrepancy I noticed is that the Free version of FSB doesn&#039;t fills data gaps correctly for bar 121 only!!!</p><p><a href="http://postimg.org/image/juyz6g4fr/"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://s7.postimg.org/juyz6g4fr/screenshot_386.jpg" alt="http://s7.postimg.org/juyz6g4fr/screenshot_386.jpg" /></span></a></p><p>If you remove &quot;Fill in data Gaps&quot; option, both programs will show the same result.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2014 15:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25277/#p25277</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Strange behavior of a strategy]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25275/#p25275</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Mr Popov, thank you for looking at this subject. I am attaching the requested files here.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Herd)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2014 08:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25275/#p25275</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Strange behavior of a strategy]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25274/#p25274</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Herd I cannot reproduce the described behavior.</p><p>Please use the default FSB data and zip and attach your strategy, data source file and profile file.<br />You can find these files under the <strong>C:\Program Files\Forex Strategy Builder Pro\User Files\System</strong> folder:</p><p><a href="http://postimg.org/image/4kuilijjr/"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://s7.postimg.org/4kuilijjr/screenshot_385.jpg" alt="http://s7.postimg.org/4kuilijjr/screenshot_385.jpg" /></span></a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2014 07:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25274/#p25274</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Strange behavior of a strategy]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25272/#p25272</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have tested this behavior once again on FSB Pro and it reproduces constantly in same strange way. But it happens only for exact values of parameters as shown here: the starting equity has to be 300€, the leverage has to be 500, the historical data set has to be the one included with FSB Pro – FSB Demo data EURUSD, H1. All other units has to be as those shown in strategy description file. </p><p>The strategy takes the starting equity from 300 to around 30000€ under one year time. But when I will change “Initial account” (in&nbsp; “Account / Account settings”) from 300€ to 301 or to 299 the strategy changes from a superb one to immediate margin call. If “Entry units for a new position” (in Strategy Properties ) will be changed from 3,00 to 3,005&nbsp; the result always changes to margin call. </p><p>But - I tried to run this strategy through Optimizer and I found that the strategy becomes even better, giving at the end of year equity of 35258€ - so some parameters can be changed without ruining the strategy. </p><p>I thought that this can be a case extreme curve fitting. But if this strategy is tested under FSB, this behavior will not take place. I wanted to attach here image of the Balance / Equity Charts showing progression from 300€ to 35258€, but I don’t yet know how to insert images – I am rather new to this forum. I will attach here the image file (instead for inserting the image into text)</p><p><a href="http://postimg.org/image/593d4gi9j/"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://s7.postimg.org/593d4gi9j/1h_Eur_Usd_Detrended_Oscillator.jpg" alt="http://s7.postimg.org/593d4gi9j/1h_Eur_Usd_Detrended_Oscillator.jpg" /></span></a></p><p>(Edited: image included in the post by using postimage - rightmost icon in the toolbar)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Herd)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 22:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25272/#p25272</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Strange behavior of a strategy]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25254/#p25254</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have been testing using leverage of 500. When changing to another leverage described strange behaviour will not appear.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Herd)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 23:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25254/#p25254</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Strange behavior of a strategy]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25251/#p25251</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Herd wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>2013-03-01 to 2014-05-19 for Alpari</p></blockquote></div><p>In FSB Pro I also get a margin call but nothing changes when I slightly change the new units.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (nquental)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 22:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25251/#p25251</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Strange behavior of a strategy]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25250/#p25250</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>2013-03-01 to 2014-05-19 for Alpari</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Herd)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 22:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25250/#p25250</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Strange behavior of a strategy]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25249/#p25249</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>What&#039;s the data horizon?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (nquental)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 22:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25249/#p25249</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Strange behavior of a strategy]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25248/#p25248</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I tested a strategy in FSB Pro which will give EXTREMELY good results on 1h chart. This is valid for parameters as in included strategy definition file. Same strategy, with same parameters, will give almost immediate Margin Call when tested on FSB. </p><p>Also if parameter “Entry units for a new position” for this strategy will be changed in FSB Pro (in Strategy Properties) from 3,00 to 2,99 or from 3,00 to 3,01 the strategy will also immediately give Margin Call. This very small change in parameters point to a probable bug, also confirmed by different behavior of FSB and FSB Pro for this strategy. </p><p>I have tested this behavior both on FSB Demo data included in FSB Pro, but also on my one set of data downloaded from Alpari server.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Herd)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 22:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/25248/#p25248</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
