<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/4599/intrabar-scanning/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/4599/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Intrabar Scanning.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:31:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/24092/#p24092</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I tested the attached strategy of PeterChristoph.<br />It gives the exactly same results in FSB and FSB Pro<br /><a href="http://postimg.org/image/p8i9ppzvf/"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://s9.postimg.org/p8i9ppzvf/screenshot_155.jpg" alt="http://s9.postimg.org/p8i9ppzvf/screenshot_155.jpg" /></span></a></p><p>If you have other strategies that you think they show different results, please attached them in the forum.</p><p>FSB and FSB Pro calculations must be 100% equal on equal inputs.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/24092/#p24092</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/24012/#p24012</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Popov wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>B52 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Unfortunately FSB Optimiser works completely non-transparent to the user , so I can not know if a backtest is reliable or not.</p></blockquote></div><p>FSB Pro will provide an easier way to track orders execution. </p><p><a href="http://postimg.org/image/viw8a7lzt/"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://s28.postimg.org/viw8a7lzt/screenshot_154.jpg" alt="http://s28.postimg.org/viw8a7lzt/screenshot_154.jpg" /></span></a></p></blockquote></div><p>For me, non-transparent means lack of information on how to do optimization. (type, criteria, etc.). Some optimizers provide this information (and many others, such as maps) (see pictures attached).<br /> But of course, this information is not vital, especially if there is a module WFA, which lead directly to conclusions.<br /><a href="http://postimg.org/image/tjn0mdya1/"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://s28.postimg.org/tjn0mdya1/fsb101.jpg" alt="http://s28.postimg.org/tjn0mdya1/fsb101.jpg" /></span></a></p><p><a href="http://postimg.org/image/51uwyhvpl/"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://s28.postimg.org/51uwyhvpl/fsb102.jpg" alt="http://s28.postimg.org/51uwyhvpl/fsb102.jpg" /></span></a></p><p><a href="http://postimg.org/image/7uo4iiw21/"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://s28.postimg.org/7uo4iiw21/fsb103.jpg" alt="http://s28.postimg.org/7uo4iiw21/fsb103.jpg" /></span></a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (B52)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/24012/#p24012</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/24011/#p24011</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Popov wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>B52 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>&quot;In my opinion FSB(Pro) + a good WFA module ( when/if will be available)= ( can be ) the best product available on the market (with no much money) &quot;</p></blockquote></div><p>WFA will be added to the product at a later stage. Probably as a free update after the final release.</p></blockquote></div><p>If you really intend to write a WFA module&nbsp; for FSB, I suggest you take a look at WFA module used by&nbsp; TradeStation. Especially at the concept of &quot;Cluster Analysis&quot;.Good Luck!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (B52)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 07:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/24011/#p24011</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23944/#p23944</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>B52 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Unfortunately FSB Optimiser works completely non-transparent to the user , so I can not know if a backtest is reliable or not.</p></blockquote></div><p>FSB Pro will provide an easier way to track orders execution. </p><p><a href="http://postimg.org/image/viw8a7lzt/"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://s28.postimg.org/viw8a7lzt/screenshot_154.jpg" alt="http://s28.postimg.org/viw8a7lzt/screenshot_154.jpg" /></span></a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 22:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23944/#p23944</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23939/#p23939</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>B52 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>&quot;In my opinion FSB(Pro) + a good WFA module ( when/if will be available)= ( can be ) the best product available on the market (with no much money) &quot;</p></blockquote></div><p>WFA will be added to the product at a later stage. Probably as a free update after the final release.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 18:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23939/#p23939</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23938/#p23938</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>PeterChristoph wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Hellow<br />I have the problem that strategies in FSB work good, but when I open the strategy in FSB Pro <br />it makes very bad results.</p></blockquote></div><p>Peter, FSB Pro and FSB must give 100% equal results on same data and settings. Please be sure all discrepancy (if any) will be fixed before the final release.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 18:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23938/#p23938</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23810/#p23810</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>B52 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I am quite skeptical if we talk about human nature. In several forums my name is &quot;The misanthrope&quot;. I am ready to pay for a quality product along with all the other users, but I will not donate because I do not know how many others do (LOL!)</p></blockquote></div><p>One of the threads has a list and I understand your reluctance.</p><p>Soon there will be an updated paid version which will outperform anything that we have seen so far, once that is selling there will be more available for programming and the project is going to take off.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Blaiserboy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23810/#p23810</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23785/#p23785</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am quite skeptical if we talk about human nature. In several forums my name is &quot;The misanthrope&quot;. I am ready to pay for a quality product along with all the other users, but I will not donate because I do not know how many others do (LOL!)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (B52)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23785/#p23785</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23755/#p23755</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>some users have donated to the cause</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Blaiserboy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23755/#p23755</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23750/#p23750</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&quot;not (too) much money&quot; &lt;&gt; &quot;free&quot;&nbsp; ; just means a decent price...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (B52)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 22:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23750/#p23750</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23748/#p23748</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Probably things will be easier to program once some folks start to contribute to the cause.... We seem to be expecting a lot for free.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Blaiserboy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23748/#p23748</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23747/#p23747</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>To make things simple, I&#039;m reminded of a post dated 08/11/2013<br />&quot;In my oppinion FSB(Pro) + a good WFA module ( when/if will be available)= ( can be ) the best product available on the market (with no much money) &quot;</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (B52)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23747/#p23747</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23727/#p23727</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>coffeesnob wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Blaiserboy wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I develop simple EA&#039;s and then backtest the idea in MT4 and use walkforward analyzer as well as EA Analyzer pro.</p><p>Takes a bit of time for the coding but gives acceptable results</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>Hi Blaiserboy, I have done very complicated strategies as well as simple ones in MT4, Backtested then and used WFA Pro as well, however given this is a forum about FSB Pro it hardly seems totally relevant, FSB/FSB Pro offers a very bright alternative to MT4, the coding interface is much easier, not to mention the fact that it is a common programing language (v MQL which is sort of C) if the backtester can be trusted in FSB Pro then to me this is a very nice solution, mt4 should have been retired years ago in my view.</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>Thanks for your input.</p><p>I don&#039;t think my message was directed to you, however, I was giving someone my own solution to the current dilemma and the question of accuracy.</p><p>Sometimes it is suitable to use more than one method to establish confidence in a system and that is the route that I have taken.</p><p>I apologize for not meeting your expectations.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Blaiserboy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23727/#p23727</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23726/#p23726</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Blaiserboy wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I develop simple EA&#039;s and then backtest the idea in MT4 and use walkforward analyzer as well as EA Analyzer pro.</p><p>Takes a bit of time for the coding but gives acceptable results</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>Hi Blaiserboy, I have done very complicated strategies as well as simple ones in MT4, Backtested then and used WFA Pro as well, however given this is a forum about FSB Pro it hardly seems totally relevant, FSB/FSB Pro offers a very bright alternative to MT4, the coding interface is much easier, not to mention the fact that it is a common programing language (v MQL which is sort of C) if the backtester can be trusted in FSB Pro then to me this is a very nice solution, mt4 should have been retired years ago in my view.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (coffeesnob)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23726/#p23726</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Intrabar Scanning]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23719/#p23719</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I develop simple EA&#039;s and then backtest the idea in MT4 and use walkforward analyzer as well as EA Analyzer pro.</p><p>Takes a bit of time for the coding but gives acceptable results</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Blaiserboy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23719/#p23719</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
