<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — computing gpu]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/4562/computing-gpu/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/4562/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in computing gpu.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:21:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23098/#p23098</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>tnickel wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Hi,<br />the biggest problem ist not the speed.<br />FSB pro uses more CPU-Cores<br />If you have a computer with 6 cores form intel you get 12 hyperthreads.<br />You can build very fast the strategies.</p><p>But 99% of the strategies don´t work.<br />99% are curvefittet, I think this is the biggest problem, not the speed.</p><p>thomas</p></blockquote></div><p>Between the two issues, there may be a strong connection.Curvefit can occur due to the small number of bars used. As I wrote in another post &quot;FSB generates too many &quot;good strategies&quot; that are very difficult to verify without having a method of measuring their robustness (WFE). I mean the old principles of Robert Pardo.My proposal is to use a genetic optimizer with settable parameters.(population size, max generations, fitness functions, etc) ,<strong> and most important , a WFA (walk forward analyser) module.</strong> .Until this proposal will be considered, no choice but to do WFA &quot;manual&quot;.<br />It is a long and painful task.<br />When you have to make 10 - 20 optimizations, each with 4-8 parameters,on 200000-500000 bars charts, speed really does matter!.<br />To write an application that can load 8 (16) cores at&gt; 80% capacity, is a task that could not be solved neither by giant companies such as TradeStation.(BTW: only, whom I know, who have solved the problem are the guys from Multichatrs).<br />In conclusion: In order to find robust strategies is needed WFA. But WFA requires higher computing speed (in parallel for all core).<br />FSB-Pro does not succeed load my CPU more than 12-15% (probably like yours, as well). <br /> So no need for GPU, but it requires a software written &quot;otherwise&quot;.<br />But, as&nbsp; Mr. Popov said, parallel programming is very complicated. This means much more money to spend...Free is too cheap!<br />For better strategies we`ll have to pay ( I presume...)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (B52)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23098/#p23098</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23078/#p23078</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>thomas</p><p>I have 4 cores and I do not find the processing to be much faster than old version, I am wondering if 6 cores is much better...</p><p>I am just about needing a new machine, that is why I am asking your opinion.</p><p>Thanks</p><p>daveM</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Blaiserboy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23078/#p23078</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23061/#p23061</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />the biggest problem ist not the speed.<br />FSB pro uses more CPU-Cores<br />If you have a computer with 6 cores form intel you get 12 hyperthreads.<br />You can build very fast the strategies.</p><p>But 99% of the strategies don´t work.<br />99% are curvefittet, I think this is the biggest problem, not the speed.</p><p>thomas</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (tnickel)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23061/#p23061</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23023/#p23023</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>ok thanks</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sandritanews)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23023/#p23023</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23022/#p23022</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Testing is already fast in FSB, to spend significant amount of development time and effort to gain maybe a tenth(?) in backtest is madness.</p><p>Generation on the other hand can benefit, but as Blaiser touched upon, it has been discussed already at length.<br /><a href="http://forexsb.com/forum/post/22512/#p22512">http://forexsb.com/forum/post/22512/#p22512</a><br /><a href="http://forexsb.com/forum/post/19817/#p19817">http://forexsb.com/forum/post/19817/#p19817</a><br /><a href="http://forexsb.com/forum/post/17473/#p17473">http://forexsb.com/forum/post/17473/#p17473</a><br /><a href="http://forexsb.com/forum/post/17605/#p17605">http://forexsb.com/forum/post/17605/#p17605</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (footon)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23022/#p23022</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23021/#p23021</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Popov has already discussed a reply to this. it is not going to be changed from what I recall from the other thread.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Blaiserboy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23021/#p23021</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23018/#p23018</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>most fast than cpu <br />and to generate strategy</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sandritanews)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2013 13:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23018/#p23018</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23013/#p23013</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Why do you need GPU for <span class="bbu">testing</span>?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (footon)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 23:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23013/#p23013</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[computing gpu]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23012/#p23012</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />can i use gpu to strategy testing?<br />if i can how?<br />my pc only use cpu cores<br />thanks</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sandritanews)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23012/#p23012</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
