<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — Forex Strategy Builder vs MetaTrader]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/409/forex-strategy-builder-vs-metatrader/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/409/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Forex Strategy Builder vs MetaTrader.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:20:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Forex Strategy Builder vs MetaTrader]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/1260/#p1260</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Popov wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>Dear Sir,</p><p>Could you please advice what is the different of your forex strategy builder with MT4 EA?<br />What is the benefit to use your software?</p><p>Your reply will much appreciate.</p><p>Thanks</p></blockquote></div><p>* FSB is a Forex strategy back tester.<br />* MT is a trading platform + back tester.</p><p>* FSB uses visual interface. All indicators, rules and parameters are arranged in menus.<br />* MT has a programmatic interface. You write your strategy in MQL4</p><p>* In FSB you can use the provided indicators only. (More than 80 at the moment.)<br />* In MT you can load or design custom indicators. (Virtually unlimited number.)</p><p>* FSB is supported and developed by me and a small group of consultants.<br />* MT is owned by a powerful company.</p><p>* FSB protects the users. You cannot set a ?faulty? strategy.<br />* MT leaves everything on your hands. You can easily write the following strategy: Enter long at the Open price when the current bar rises. Close at the Close price. </p><p>* FSB has more indicator parameters.&nbsp; For Accelerator Oscillator you can set: smoothing method, base price, slow MA period, fast MA period, forming MA period, critical level, and logic of application.<br />* MT has no options in its standard AE.</p><p>* FSB recognizes the ambiguous bars. These are the bars with more than one active order within the bar range. They are vital for a reliable back test.<br />* MT does not know anything about such bars. (Or it hides them from the user.)</p><p>* FSB tells you all about the back test:<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; - all orders: sent, canceled and executed;<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; - it shows you the price route within a bar;<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; - it counts the ambiguous bars<br />* MT has only trading statistics and a simple journal</p><p>* FSB is extremely fast. It makes a back test with all available intrabar data for less than a second.<br />* MT is extremely slow. I really don&#039;t know what they are doing so long.</p><p>* FSB manages the ambiguous bars using different interpolation methods; pessimistic, optimistic, nearest order first, shortest price route, and random execution.<br />* MT uses unknown interpolation method.</p><p>That is my opinion about both products but it might be subjective.<br /> You are welcome to add or correct me <img src="https://forexsb.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p></blockquote></div><p>This is what I needed to read right now. I want to trade perfectly.I hate code but love the curves and have had enogh math to appreciate the goal and get paid for my interest. I just sat through a tutorial by some showingme &quot;do All magic switches&quot;. Thanx. Be strong and very courageous.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (delbertino)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/1260/#p1260</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Forex Strategy Builder vs MetaTrader]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/1257/#p1257</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The FSB&#039;s strategies are easy for trade. We always know the position&#039;s entry price at the moment of the bar opening.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (rodrigo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/1257/#p1257</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Forex Strategy Builder vs MetaTrader]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/1253/#p1253</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>FSB ++<br /> - strategy generator<br /> - strategy overview</p><p>FSB --<br /> - there is no automatic data update</p><p>MT--<br /> for non programmers it is a charting tool</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (zumma)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/1253/#p1253</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Forex Strategy Builder vs MetaTrader]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/1250/#p1250</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>Dear Sir,</p><p>Could you please advice what is the different of your forex strategy builder with MT4 EA?<br />What is the benefit to use your software?</p><p>Your reply will much appreciate.</p><p>Thanks</p></blockquote></div><p>* FSB is a Forex strategy back tester.<br />* MT is a trading platform + back tester.</p><p>* FSB uses visual interface. All indicators, rules and parameters are arranged in menus.<br />* MT has a programmatic interface. You write your strategy in MQL4</p><p>* In FSB you can use the provided indicators only. (More than 80 at the moment.)<br />* In MT you can load or design custom indicators. (Virtually unlimited number.)</p><p>* FSB is supported and developed by me and a small group of consultants.<br />* MT is owned by a powerful company.</p><p>* FSB protects the users. You cannot set a ?faulty? strategy.<br />* MT leaves everything on your hands. You can easily write the following strategy: Enter long at the Open price when the current bar rises. Close at the Close price. </p><p>* FSB has more indicator parameters.&nbsp; For Accelerator Oscillator you can set: smoothing method, base price, slow MA period, fast MA period, forming MA period, critical level, and logic of application.<br />* MT has no options in its standard AE.</p><p>* FSB recognizes the ambiguous bars. These are the bars with more than one active order within the bar range. They are vital for a reliable back test.<br />* MT does not know anything about such bars. (Or it hides them from the user.)</p><p>* FSB tells you all about the back test:<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; - all orders: sent, canceled and executed;<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; - it shows you the price route within a bar;<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; - it counts the ambiguous bars<br />* MT has only trading statistics and a simple journal</p><p>* FSB is extremely fast. It makes a back test with all available intrabar data for less than a second.<br />* MT is extremely slow. I really don&#039;t know what they are doing so long.</p><p>* FSB manages the ambiguous bars using different interpolation methods; pessimistic, optimistic, nearest order first, shortest price route, and random execution.<br />* MT uses unknown interpolation method.</p><p>That is my opinion about both products but it might be subjective.<br /> You are welcome to add or correct me <img src="https://forexsb.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/1250/#p1250</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
