<![CDATA[Forex Software — Possible optimizer bug in 2.56.3]]> https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/1924/possible-optimizer-bug-in-2563/ Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:12:21 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: Possible optimizer bug in 2.56.3]]> https://forexsb.com/forum/post/7273/#p7273 Yes, if the Minimum number of trades = off, then the optimizer produces zero trades. I got results when I switched  Minimum number of trades = on.

I tested several times, but then I got this kind of situation:

http://s3.postimage.org/2g9vhhfus/screenshot_13.jpg

I had to manually set minimum strating values into the default indicator dialog to get it working rightly.

http://s2.postimage.org/1lvmwy3c4/screenshot_14.jpg

Popov wrote:

I tested the strategy and found out that optimizer shows zero trades only when "Minimum number of trades" option is switched off. Can you confirm that Optimizer shows zero trades when that option is on?

]]> Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:12:21 +0000 https://forexsb.com/forum/post/7273/#p7273 <![CDATA[Re: Possible optimizer bug in 2.56.3]]> https://forexsb.com/forum/post/7265/#p7265 I tested the strategy and found out that optimizer shows zero trades only when "Minimum number of trades" option is switched off. Can you confirm that Optimizer shows zero trades when that option is on?

]]> Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:01:02 +0000 https://forexsb.com/forum/post/7265/#p7265 <![CDATA[Re: Possible optimizer bug in 2.56.3]]> https://forexsb.com/forum/post/7263/#p7263 This moving average crossover is intended to be the trade direction and trend filer to prevent trades against the main trend.

]]> Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:59:42 +0000 https://forexsb.com/forum/post/7263/#p7263 <![CDATA[Re: Possible optimizer bug in 2.56.3]]> https://forexsb.com/forum/post/7262/#p7262 I agree that this is a bad idea to optimize loosing strategies. I use limited optimization at the beginning of the strategy development. I have found that it's reasonable to optimize only 1-2 indicators in the strategy.

I included my unfinished strategy idea. I used 250 000 bars of data within the optimization.

Popov wrote:

It's not good idea to optimize loosing strategies. The optimizer will produce a strategy without deals because it's better then a loosing one, in case it cannot find a better one. 

The optimizer sets equal number in order to prevent trades. It seams no combination of the selected parameters can lead to a winning strategy.

But this must not happen if "Minimum number of trades" is set to some number.
If your case is not this, please attach the strategy and your config file in the forum. I'll check it.

]]> Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:57:24 +0000 https://forexsb.com/forum/post/7262/#p7262 <![CDATA[Re: Possible optimizer bug in 2.56.3]]> https://forexsb.com/forum/post/7261/#p7261 It's not good idea to optimize loosing strategies. The optimizer will produce a strategy without deals because it's better then a loosing one, in case it cannot find a better one. 

The optimizer sets equal number in order to prevent trades. It seams no combination of the selected parameters can lead to a winning strategy.

But this must not happen if "Minimum number of trades" is set to some number.
If your case is not this, please attach the strategy and your config file in the forum. I'll check it.

]]> Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:30:28 +0000 https://forexsb.com/forum/post/7261/#p7261 <![CDATA[Possible optimizer bug in 2.56.3]]> https://forexsb.com/forum/post/7259/#p7259 Hi Popov

There is a strange behaviour in Optimizer. I tried to optimize this indicator with the option: fast MA > slow MA:

http://s4.postimage.org/1oanntj38/screenshot_10.jpg

Then I got a zero strategy. Both fast MA and slow MA values are the same (21).

http://s2.postimage.org/1g1vl3gis/screenshot_12.jpg

I tried this several times.

]]> Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:09:42 +0000 https://forexsb.com/forum/post/7259/#p7259