<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — Backtest of EAStudio differ from MT5]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/10075/backtest-of-eastudio-differ-from-mt5/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/10075/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Backtest of EAStudio differ from MT5.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 13:44:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Backtest of EAStudio differ from MT5]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83292/#p83292</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I assume both a corect (in their way of computation).</p><p>The most important for you is the backtest in MetaTrader 5 with Real ticks.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 13:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83292/#p83292</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Backtest of EAStudio differ from MT5]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83291/#p83291</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p><p>I downloaded the price data from my FTMO MT5 to the EAStudio<br />with spread of 10 points (the typical spread is 2-5 points- EURUSD)<br />then created strategies - optimized for 2016-2025<br />the good ones i (bactested on MT5 for the first months of 2026, and then) backtested on MT5 for 2016- 2025<br />usually number of trades is similar, but the results many times very different</p><p>Who can explain? Which of them is right?</p><p>Regards,<br />Avraham</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (shenkar23)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 12:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83291/#p83291</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
