<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forex Software — Walk Forward Efficiency metric]]></title>
		<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/10029/walk-forward-efficiency-metric/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/rss/topic/10029/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Walk Forward Efficiency metric.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 07:02:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Walk Forward Efficiency metric]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83179/#p83179</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It is even better if we have annualized values for all suitable stats metrics.<br />Or even to have modifiers like: total, monthly, annual</p><p>Example:<br />Count of trades: xxx<br />Count of trades (annual): xxx<br />Count of trades (monthly): xxx</p><p>...</p><p>There are a lot of cool ideas for updates and new features. I have to use a planner or a kanban system to arrange them.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 07:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83179/#p83179</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Walk Forward Efficiency metric]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83177/#p83177</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>trademaster084 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>But than the there should be annualized, since the is profit is mostly generated over more years than oos. Otherwise its not easy to compare.</p></blockquote></div><p>Yes, it should be annualized one.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (arianbhm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 05:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83177/#p83177</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Walk Forward Efficiency metric]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83176/#p83176</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>But than the there should be annualized, since the is profit is mostly generated over more years than oos. Otherwise its not easy to compare.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (trademaster084)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 22:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83176/#p83176</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Walk Forward Efficiency metric]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83016/#p83016</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting idea. Thank you!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Popov)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83016/#p83016</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Walk Forward Efficiency metric]]></title>
			<link>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83011/#p83011</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>I was reviewing EA Studio and I’m not sure whether this option already exists—probably not. There are some important features that, if added to the current version, would be very useful for customers.</p><p>In the Walk-Forward section, a commonly used metric called Walk-Forward Efficiency (WFE) should be included, as many similar programs provide it. Since the panel already displays all data for each segment, it should be easy to add WFE.</p><p>WFE = Sum(OOS net profit) / Sum(IS net profit)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (arianbhm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 06:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83011/#p83011</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
