<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — sharpe ratio]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/9941/" />
	<updated>2025-05-07T12:05:05Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/9941/sharpe-ratio/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: sharpe ratio]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/82669/#p82669" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s the key! You&#039;d be impressed by how well that validation Mr. Popov mentions works.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Popov wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Sharpe Ratio represents the how big is the profit relatively to the balance and the profit volatility.</p><p>Simply said, the Sharpe Ratio will be higher when a strategy makes higher consistent profit.<br />A reason for low Sharpe ratio is a big variation of the profit and loss size.</p><p>Besides the trading rules, the strategy performance greatly depends on the commission, swaps, and spreads.</p><p>I would not put too much attention to the stats metrics.<br />For me the most important criteria evaluating a strategy is to make a profit on new data, no mater if it is on backtest, real or demo trading.</p></blockquote></div>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[kitomc]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/14141/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2025-05-07T12:05:05Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/82669/#p82669</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: sharpe ratio]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/82668/#p82668" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Sharpe Ratio represents the how big is the profit relatively to the balance and the profit volatility.</p><p>Simply said, the Sharpe Ratio will be higher when a strategy makes higher consistent profit.<br />A reason for low Sharpe ratio is a big variation of the profit and loss size.</p><p>Besides the trading rules, the strategy performance greatly depends on the commission, swaps, and spreads.</p><p>I would not put too much attention to the stats metrics.<br />For me the most important criteria evaluating a strategy is to make a profit on new data, no mater if it is on backtest, real or demo trading.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2025-05-07T10:11:16Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/82668/#p82668</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[sharpe ratio]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/82667/#p82667" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Dear all</p><p>I made an EA with EA studio. The EA profits $3536 and sharpe ratio 0.16 with premium historical data. <br />I run the same EA with different hitorical data in&nbsp; the same period. Historical data-1 gave $4713 sharpe ratio 4.14 and Historical data-2 yielded $6364 sharpe ratio 5.60. Why EA studio sharpe ratio is too low?<br />any comments I appreciate, thank you</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[moonb123]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/11257/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2025-05-07T09:14:16Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/82667/#p82667</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
