<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Incubation Win Rate and KPIs]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/9695/" />
	<updated>2024-04-05T05:39:06Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/9695/incubation-win-rate-and-kpis/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Incubation Win Rate and KPIs]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79322/#p79322" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello Blaiserboy,</p><p>Did not get your question, what should I do with&nbsp; FXBlue?<br />I am not talking about the ea performances, these KPIs are one level up.</p><p>I am measuring the efficiency of the reactor process, basically how many EA in incubation (demo) becomes active and how many of them are in profit. </p><p>Questions are :</p><p>- is there any setup of the reactor which produce an higher win rate (EAs active/incubatated, In profit/active) ?<br />- is there any setting negatively affecting this outcome ?</p><p>Hope is clearer now.<br />Thx<br />Vincenzo</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Vincenzo]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/14930/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-04-05T05:39:06Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79322/#p79322</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Incubation Win Rate and KPIs]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79318/#p79318" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Can you not pick preferred results from FXBlue?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Blaiserboy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2491/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-04-04T19:13:37Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79318/#p79318</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Incubation Win Rate and KPIs]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79179/#p79179" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Anyone willing to share this kind of experience ?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Vincenzo]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/14930/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-03-22T06:47:15Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79179/#p79179</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Incubation Win Rate and KPIs]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79070/#p79070" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello Everyone,</p><p>I have defined some KPIs (key performance indicators) to measure the consistency and efficiency of the EA creation process. </p><p>In few easy word, once developed a strategy and created a certain numbers of EAs, I am measuring the following dimensions into the incubation process :</p><p>- numbers of EA incubated (e.g. 100)<br />- numbers of EA which become active after half of the planned incubation time (e.g. after 6 weeks 48 EA have at least a trade done)<br />- numbers of EAs in profit after half of the planned incubation time.</p><p>I will also collect the same data at the end of the incubation, so then T1 corresponds to 6 weeks and T2 to 12 weeks.</p><p>Actually I see the following :</p><p>After 6 weeks (T1) I have on average 48% of the EAs active and 59% of the in profit.</p><p>But, if I drill the T1 KPIs down to the single strategy I have in incubation, then I see a very wide range:</p><p>From&nbsp; 9% to 100% active EAs.<br />From 14% to 90%&nbsp; in profit Es.</p><p>Is any one experiencing the same ?<br />Is any one analyzing these kind of performances and understanding the route causes behind so wide ranges?</p><p>Regards<br />Vincenzo</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Vincenzo]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/14930/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-03-14T05:33:58Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/79070/#p79070</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
