<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — FSBpro EAs backtest in MetaTrader Strategy Tester]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/9536/" />
	<updated>2023-08-21T12:43:09Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/9536/fsbpro-eas-backtest-in-metatrader-strategy-tester/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: FSBpro EAs backtest in MetaTrader Strategy Tester]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/76184/#p76184" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello Alann,</p><p>The MetaTrader 4&#039;s &quot;Evry tick&quot; is broken. I do not use it.</p><p>I prefer the Control Points method for the FSB Pro robots.</p><p>For the robots from EA Studio, I prefer Open price only.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-08-21T12:43:09Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/76184/#p76184</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: FSBpro EAs backtest in MetaTrader Strategy Tester]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/76182/#p76182" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>When backtesting an EA, created by FSBpro, in the MT4 Strategy Tester, which is the best model to use, Every tick, Control points, or Open prices?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Alann]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/14347/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-08-21T11:36:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/76182/#p76182</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: FSBpro EAs backtest in MetaTrader Strategy Tester]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/76154/#p76154" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the clarification!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Alann]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/14347/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-08-19T11:38:35Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/76154/#p76154</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: FSBpro EAs backtest in MetaTrader Strategy Tester]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/76149/#p76149" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It is how FSB Pro works.</p><p>When you export an Expert Advisor with FSB Pro, it comes with an embedded indicators code for all indicators the particular strategy is using.</p><p>This is accurate as possible for the standard FSB Pro indicators and most of the available custom indicators.</p><p>On the other hand, EA Studio uses mainly native MT indicators.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-08-19T05:51:00Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/76149/#p76149</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[FSBpro EAs backtest in MetaTrader Strategy Tester]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/76129/#p76129" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>With FSBpro it is possible to create EAs using indicators that are not in the MT4 or MT5 library.&nbsp; Can EAs containing indicators not in the MetaTrader library be accurately backtested with the MetaTrader Strategy Tester?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Alann]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/14347/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-08-17T14:14:39Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/76129/#p76129</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
