<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — StrategyQuantX vs FSBPRo]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/8433/" />
	<updated>2020-12-02T09:49:13Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/8433/strategyquantx-vs-fsbpro/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: StrategyQuantX vs FSBPRo]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/63194/#p63194" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I tried SQ ones. It made a strategy that compares MACD with RSI. I quit.</p><p>Contrarily to that, FSB Pro always provides logically correct strategies. We specially made it to not be possible to compare apples with oranges.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-12-02T09:49:13Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/63194/#p63194</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: StrategyQuantX vs FSBPRo]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/63179/#p63179" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Update to my last post: I just purchased the &quot;ultra&quot; part of SQX.&nbsp; It still has some bugs, but things are getting better.&nbsp; The best part of SQX is that doing a back test in MT4/5 is fairly fast.&nbsp; FSB is close to impossible to get a MT4/5 back test done in a few days.&nbsp; </p><p>Just a heads up.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[JamesBay]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/12600/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-11-30T21:40:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/63179/#p63179</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: StrategyQuantX vs FSBPRo]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/62963/#p62963" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I own both now as well as some other EA and Indicator building methods.&nbsp; From an &quot;ease of use&quot; standpoint, SQX is far better because everything is integrated and flawless.&nbsp; &nbsp;From a practical building perspective, FSB is better.&nbsp; Each comes with additional software that is helpful in building EA&#039;s and the pricing is similar.&nbsp; BUT - I have yet to get a workable EA out of SQX for 3 months.&nbsp; SQX you have to leave your computer running 24/7 for days to come up with some whereas FSB takes only a minute or 2.&nbsp; But either way, I have specific signal combinations that work on a chart and manually that both software products cannot duplicate.&nbsp; Or - I am not using them correctly.</p><p>If you only want one piece of software - FSB is the best choice.&nbsp; It is faster to create a strategy and test.&nbsp; The support from author is also better. </p><p>All the best.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[JamesBay]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/12600/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-11-10T18:57:41Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/62963/#p62963</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: StrategyQuantX vs FSBPRo]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/61007/#p61007" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>You will have to test both aggressively to answer your questions.&nbsp; Someone else&#039; opinion will not serve you well</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Blaiserboy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2491/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-06-04T18:12:30Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/61007/#p61007</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[StrategyQuantX vs FSBPRo]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/60959/#p60959" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>I&#039;m interesting purchasing either SQX or FSBPro for FX in MT4 and would be interested in hearing some objective opinions comparing the two. </p><p>I value of course the production of strategies (with longevity), simplicity, replication of results on MT4 and most importantly, the ability to stress-test strategies to avoid curve-fitting e.g. multi-market, multi-time frame tests, enter/exit [x] bars later, MC with skipping trades, the ability to select &quot;chunks&quot; of OOS periods etc. I would like to, at the least, create a variety of robust strategies that work well as a portfolio across instruments. </p><p>At the moment, I am looking at daily time frames only but in future will diversify with intra-day.</p><p>Can FSBPRO be used with indices and futures?</p><br /><p>Just to be clear, I would be OK trading a strategy that doesn&#039;t &quot;make sense&quot; to human intuition provided it is rigourously tested to rule out curve-fitting e.g. if an &quot;illogical strategy&quot; trades well across 10 markets for years, I don&#039;t care if it doesn&#039;t make &quot;logical sense&quot;</p><p>Thanks</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[zikka1]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/12235/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-06-02T12:23:54Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/60959/#p60959</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
