<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Calling Geektrader!!]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/7786/" />
	<updated>2019-04-09T21:57:11Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/7786/calling-geektrader/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Calling Geektrader!!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/55064/#p55064" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi Geek, </p><p>I was doing some reading on the forum and saw you mention a new strategy you have or creating hundreds of EA Studio strategies and putting them live knowing that 60% or so will fail but playing the numbers game. </p><p>I’d love to further discuss this with you as I for one have taken the approach of generating millions of strategies with very strict criteria (performing Almost as well in 20%oos, as well as across at least 5/20 markets). <br />I have only been using this approach for a month or so so I cannot come to any definitive conclusions as to how well this works. </p><p>I have loved reading you posts in the ‘success stories’ thread about your approach on massive amounts of backtesting data as well as multi market testing.<br />However I am a bit confused as these two approaches of yours seem to contradict one another in the way that the timeframe you mentioned you built 100 strategies to use seemed very short. I may be wrong however. </p><p>I have taken your approach of as much backtesting data I can get my hands on and bought myself a Threadripper <img src="https://forexsb.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Michael1]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/10884/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-04-09T21:57:11Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/55064/#p55064</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
