<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/7645" />
	<updated>2019-01-07T05:08:27Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/7645/balance-line-stability-development/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53645/#p53645" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi Popov,</p><p>so far everything seems to work great with R-Squared now! Thank you again :-)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-07T05:08:27Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53645/#p53645</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53625/#p53625" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hehe, interesting :-) I will have to refresh this evening as I´ve started a run just an hour ago, but I will report back, of course :-)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-05T09:11:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53625/#p53625</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53624/#p53624" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the report!</p><p>It was a problem indeed. I have forgotten to add r-squared to the OOS target criteria. I don&#039;t know how it worked at all <img src="https://forexsb.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> It optimized for best r^2 but returned some random variant of the strategies found because all OOS r^2 was 0.</p><p>Now it is fixed and uploaded. Please refresh with Ctrl + F5.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-05T06:13:04Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53624/#p53624</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53623/#p53623" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I get the feeling that there is something wrong if optimizing for R-Squared. Could it be that R-Squared in the Optimizer is accidentally linked to the Balance line stability and is really optimizing for that instead of R-Squared? To me, it seems like that is the case. Can you check, please?</p><p>E.g.: I select R-Squared as the target for the Optimizer and it optimizes fine, but I somehow get the feeling that it actually optimizes for the highest Balance line stability value instead of the highest R-Squared value, like if there is a wrong link in your code and R-Squared points to Balance line stability during the optimization, so that in reality the optimizer, while correctly calculating R-Squared of course, is really optimizing for the maximum Balance line stability. I think this happened when you´ve re-added / renamed R-Squared *and* Balance line stability this evening, seems like the R-Squared optimizer target is acutally pointing to Balance line stability.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-04T23:54:07Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53623/#p53623</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53621/#p53621" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yea me too, but nothing in there, the tab just fully crashes, but no logs.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-04T22:26:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53621/#p53621</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53620/#p53620" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m running the latest version with Reactor and R-squared optimization on two machines and no errors or crashes were noted.</p><p>If it happens and I can reproduce it I&#039;ll be able to fix it immediately. I&#039;m keeping the browser&#039;s Console open for any case.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-04T22:24:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53620/#p53620</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53619/#p53619" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Just crashed again (Firefox, never crashed before with EA Studio), but I can´t see any output in it´s &quot;Browser Console&quot; that would explain the crash. What´s also odd: I had optimized for R-Squared and it ended up with a value of 99.02. Once going back to the editor (keeping the changes), it jumped down to 98.52. Seems like there is some bug somewhere...</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-04T22:18:17Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53619/#p53619</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53617/#p53617" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Seems I can´t reproduce the crash right now, but I´ll let you know if it happens again.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-04T22:00:45Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53617/#p53617</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53616/#p53616" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Odd, but surely we will see. We have a well working R-Squared for now at least. And as I´ve mentioned the &quot;Balance line stability&quot; showed good values right before you did that OOS / IS fix yesterday (the one where you said the index for the OOS was wrong - right after that Balance line stability began to show these strange values of 83 instead of 97 it showed before for the almost perfect strategy).</p><p>I also just had a crash of EA Studio now during optimization after you´ve re-added Balance line stability. Will try to debug the cause...</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-04T21:46:11Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53616/#p53616</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53615/#p53615" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>But as I understood, you are going to rework the formula for Balance line stability, right?</p></blockquote></div><p>It is now an adopted version of the code you sent me, however it doesn&#039;t work very well as it is now. I&#039;ll try to fix and improve it for our case.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-04T21:43:15Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53615/#p53615</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53614/#p53614" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Great, just tested that too, but look at how different the values are for this almost perfect equity curve. Why would Balance line stability only show 87? It´s so close to a straight line that it can´t get much better. R-squared shows that correct with 97. But as I understood, you are going to rework the formula for Balance line stability, right?</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.imgur.com/McdPR3l.jpg" alt="https://i.imgur.com/McdPR3l.jpg" /></span></p><p>Have a nice weekend too :-)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-04T21:37:01Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53614/#p53614</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53613/#p53613" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Now we have both: Balance line stability and R - squared in sorting, filtering, Acceptance Criteria, Search best...</p><p><a href="https://image-holder.forexsb.com/store/eas-r-squared.png"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://image-holder.forexsb.com/store/eas-r-squared-thumb.png" alt="https://image-holder.forexsb.com/store/eas-r-squared-thumb.png" /></span></a></p><p>Have a great weekend!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-04T21:24:07Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53613/#p53613</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53612/#p53612" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Great! Now the new R-Squared is working right. Look at this.</p><p>Initial strategy:</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.imgur.com/VEVtFpy.jpg" alt="https://i.imgur.com/VEVtFpy.jpg" /></span></p><p>Optimized for R-Squared:</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.imgur.com/Y6yihVV.jpg" alt="https://i.imgur.com/Y6yihVV.jpg" /></span></p><br /><p>As we can see, the values look right (97.X before, 99.X after) and the equity line is more straight too - that all makes sense now. Will run some more tests...</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-04T21:04:51Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53612/#p53612</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53611/#p53611" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Actually you are right.</p><p>I&#039;ll introduce the new option &quot;R-Squared&quot; within an hour and will return the previous stability formula.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-04T21:00:18Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53611/#p53611</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Stability - Development]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53610/#p53610" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Looks good at a first test, the problematic strategy I´ve posted a few posts ago that had an almost perfectly straight equity line but just showed &quot;83&quot;, now shows &quot;99.26&quot;, which is correct, as it is almost a straight line, testing extensively now... If you plan to place this separately as &quot;R-Squared&quot; into the metrics, I would recommend to name it &quot;R-Squared&quot; right now already and re-add &quot;Balance line stability&quot; when you´ve finished it again with your own formula, whenever that is. This way config-files will not get messed up for your users.</p><p>Seeing that you´ve placed the code on Github, does this mean we can now somehow code our own metrics in JS and insert them into EA Studio? That would be cool!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-01-04T20:49:18Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53610/#p53610</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
