<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Pepperstone Data vs TrueFx]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/7450/" />
	<updated>2018-10-17T04:59:29Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/7450/pepperstone-data-vs-truefx/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pepperstone Data vs TrueFx]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/52605/#p52605" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>thanks for comments Doc, will go back &amp; check out that thread.&nbsp; I ended up sticking with broker data which goes back to 2013 generally for H1 bars &amp; definitely got better.</p><p>Another idea is maybe use a Dukascopy account, does anyone know that data is consistent with data fro their MT4 account?</p><p>Anyway onto my next challenge...robustness &amp; figuring out appropriate criteria for WF / MC.&nbsp; Current failure rate of systems is very high!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[engtraderfx]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/10664/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-10-17T04:59:29Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/52605/#p52605</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pepperstone Data vs TrueFx]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/52564/#p52564" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hey Engtrader, </p><p>I&#039;ve doe a lot of work on the topic of matching data to backtesters - and learned a few things along the way:</p><p>- Setting up slippage , comms , swap etc is critical. <br />- If you compare different brokers you will always have differences (Decentralized markets , different ways of handling slippage /executions, comms). </p><p>If you want - there is a thread in the premium club that I go through this process comparing the performance of difference software /data. </p><p>The last point (probably my most imporant). Changing data can be a benefit - if you have a robust system that works on one set of data, change data and see what happens - its basically another form of robust test.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[DoCZero]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9907/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-10-13T02:23:27Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/52564/#p52564</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pepperstone Data vs TrueFx]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/51762/#p51762" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>thanks for replying yonkuro, dukospy does seem to be used predominantly, will try that &amp; compare to broker data.&nbsp; Chrs.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[engtraderfx]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/10664/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-08-06T23:45:45Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/51762/#p51762</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pepperstone Data vs TrueFx]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/51758/#p51758" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi engtraderfx,</p><p>I don&#039;t have experience with pepperstone data, but I&#039;m also dealing with different data sources, I usually use dukascopy data downloaded from FSB Pro, then I just raised the the spread and commision before import it from EA Studio. I use 17 pips spread and $3 commission and negative swap fees on both directions.</p><p>So I ran the reactor in a bad trading environment and the generated strategies usually give better result when validated with real broker data.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[yonkuro]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/8447/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-08-06T15:02:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/51758/#p51758</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Pepperstone Data vs TrueFx]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/51746/#p51746" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>ok, working thru trial now to see if I can make EAS work &amp; after reading many posts re needing good data I realised my real Pepperstone account only goes back a few years with broker data &amp; rest was filled in with metaquotes history.&nbsp; So now used Tick DataSuite downloader to get hold of TrueFx price (https://www.truefx.com/) which is meant to be source of Pepperstone (Aust), which does have tick data download but only to late 2016.&nbsp; </p><p>I imported data adjusted to Broker GMT+3 &amp; developed some great looking curves then tried another backtest just using my Pepperstone real account data which only goes back a few years &amp; system really changes again!&nbsp; Darn, feel like going around in circles.&nbsp; Does anyone have experience with the Pepperstone broker data?&nbsp; Should I bother then with TrueFx or just use the last 2 years of broker data only to develop systems?&nbsp; Any thoughts appreciated!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[engtraderfx]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/10664/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-08-06T03:02:33Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/51746/#p51746</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
