<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Change process Walk forward with Monte Carlo]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/7440/" />
	<updated>2018-07-30T12:01:17Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/7440/change-process-walk-forward-with-monte-carlo/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Change process Walk forward with Monte Carlo]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/51640/#p51640" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Walk Forward uses the Optimizer algorithm and is more similar to it than to the other tools. The reason I put it to optimizer is that we may add a possibility to accept the last optimized variant. If we do it it would be an actual modification of the strategy. On the other hand&nbsp; the Monte Carlo and the Multi Market only validate the strategy and the must be after the modification tools.</p><p>Workflow:&nbsp; Acquisition (Generator, Validator)&nbsp; -&gt;&nbsp; Optimization (Optimizer or Walk Forward) -&gt; Validation&nbsp; &nbsp;(Monte Carlo, Multi Market ... future tools)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-07-30T12:01:17Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/51640/#p51640</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Change process Walk forward with Monte Carlo]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/51602/#p51602" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to change the processes of ea studio that first monte carlo validation will calculate strategies and after passed monte carlo it will do walk forward.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[deadlef]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9894/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-07-28T19:56:25Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/51602/#p51602</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
