<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/7276/" />
	<updated>2021-02-17T01:16:49Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/7276/balance-line-deviation-incorrect/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/63972/#p63972" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p><p>just tested the latest FSB Pro and see this still hasn´t been added or adjust, almost 5 years after reporting it. Is this still planned?</p><p>Thank you.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2021-02-17T01:16:49Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/63972/#p63972</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53506/#p53506" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, but balance line deviation has been removed and stagnation does not really say much, the strategy can still have long almost-flat-periods where there was just a gain of $1. The only reliable measure would be a working r squared of the equity curve, but Popov is working on it :-)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-12-31T07:38:17Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/53506/#p53506</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/52633/#p52633" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi Popov,</p><p>just wondering about this one too - is it going to come before the end of the year still? Haven´t found it in the latest updates...</p><p>Thanks so much :-)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-10-19T03:06:29Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/52633/#p52633</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50994/#p50994" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Haha OK, good stuff, keep up the good work <img src="https://forexsb.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> Thanks!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-06-18T22:55:49Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50994/#p50994</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50966/#p50966" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is. I have currently 27 tasks in my EA Studio ToDo list and work on them. It is realistically to say that I&#039;ll complete most of them before the end of the year.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-06-18T04:12:59Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50966/#p50966</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50961/#p50961" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mr. Popov,</p><p>can you please be so kind to to let us know if this implementation is still planned?</p><p>Thank you.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-06-17T20:23:41Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50961/#p50961</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50564/#p50564" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Popov wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I may use formula similar to the one I use for the Correlation analysis. Than we can have 100% if the balance line is a straight line.</p></blockquote></div><p>Dear Mr. Popov,</p><p>any news on that yet? I would really like to see this in EA studio to be able to use the correlation for the equity curve and how much it deviates from a straight line. Thanks so much :-)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-05-18T20:04:15Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50564/#p50564</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50563/#p50563" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is exactly it :-) Does it work now?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-05-18T20:02:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50563/#p50563</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50520/#p50520" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I saved the original .cs file with a new name and gave the new file the original file name.&nbsp; Is this the correct procedure?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Freebird]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/10422/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-05-14T20:22:39Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50520/#p50520</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50515/#p50515" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Check if the &quot;Load custom account stats&quot; is enabled.</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://s7.postimg.cc/itooswnkr/screenshot_217.png" alt="https://s7.postimg.cc/itooswnkr/screenshot_217.png" /></span></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-05-14T14:12:13Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50515/#p50515</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50501/#p50501" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>All,</p><p>I put Geektrader&#039;s AccountStatistics.cs file in this folder (C:\Program Files\Forex Strategy Builder Pro\User Files\Code) and restarted FSB but have not noticed a change.&nbsp; Is there something else I must do?</p><p>Should I see a change in the Account Statistics section or the Acceptance Criteria, or somewhere else?</p><p>This is my first time tweaking this.&nbsp; I&#039;m only a 2 month FSB user.</p><p>Thanks.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Freebird]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/10422/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-05-11T20:02:55Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50501/#p50501</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50155/#p50155" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guys,</p><p>I´ve finally gotten around to implement this in the way that I need it (almost). Please try the attached &quot;AccountStatistics.cs&quot; file. The &quot;Filter non-linear balance pattern&quot; in the Acceptance Criterias now uses the average % deviation from a perfect straight line taken from ALL trades the system made and WITHOUT taking the initial balance into account (like it was before). </p><p>The &quot;checkpoints&quot; it uses for that are automatically adjusted to the amount of total trades within each system instead of a previously fixed amount of 100. So this metric will now always be independent from the starting balance and lot-size that the system trades (if fixed lots are being used). Give it a try and use a value of &quot;30&quot; for the &quot;Filter non-linear balance pattern&quot; and you will only get systems with a very straight net profit growth-line.&nbsp; Of course you can tighten this further (or relax it), if needed. Just give it a try and you´ll see how this is different to how it was implemented before (no more bias to prefer systems with few profit but high stability, starting balance makes no more difference, lot-size makes no more difference either) ...</p><p>While at it, I noticed that FSB Pro does not display the Total Trades in the Account Statistics, but only the Executed Orders. I´ve added that in my opinion very important missing metric to the Account Statistics as well.</p><p>Good luck creating stable systems ;-)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-04-12T08:20:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/50155/#p50155</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/49979/#p49979" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Popov wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I may use formula similar to the one I use for the Correlation analysis. Than we can have 100% if the balance line is a straight line.</p></blockquote></div><p>Any news about that new metric already? It would be fantastic to have it just the way you´ve described it there (100% if straight, etc......). Would really love to have this one ASAP :-) :-)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-04-03T18:23:38Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/49979/#p49979</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/49765/#p49765" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://sc.mogicons.com/c/192.jpg" alt="https://sc.mogicons.com/c/192.jpg" /></span></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[geektrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1841/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-03-23T00:07:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/49765/#p49765</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Balance Line Deviation incorrect?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/49763/#p49763" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I may use formula similar to the one I use for the Correlation analysis. Than we can have 100% if the balance line is a straight line.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-03-22T22:08:01Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/49763/#p49763</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
