<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Pruning Strategies (my 2 cents)]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/7164/" />
	<updated>2018-01-08T07:03:14Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/7164/pruning-strategies-my-2-cents/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Pruning Strategies (my 2 cents)]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/48619/#p48619" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />So have been pruning strategies that do not perform and not much impact on the overall performance of the portfolio. I tried a different approach. Instead of pruning I have started to optimize the non performing strategies and have had better results. I do this after a period of a month or so.</p><p>The reason why I did that was because if a strategy passed my criteria for a period of (12,000 bars H1) in the backtest then there must be something that is not letting it perform. I do analysis to see things like..did this strategy always incur losses in December...look at the market for December and see how the market has changed for example a pair hit a peak that it had not hit in the past 2 years...simple stuff like that.</p><p>The second reason was that a strategy that did bad in one month did amazing in another month..so pruning would not have helped.</p><p>Taking the portfolio approach...so many strategies for each pair and then many pairs.</p><p>Regards,</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[araza]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/10033/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-01-08T07:03:14Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/48619/#p48619</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
