<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Reverse closing logic for "CCI Buy Sell Zones"]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/7080/" />
	<updated>2017-11-28T13:35:06Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/7080/reverse-closing-logic-for-cci-buy-sell-zones/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Reverse closing logic for "CCI Buy Sell Zones"]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47893/#p47893" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>No need to answer. Today checked on indicator chart, it worked out this way. There is some paradox in trading with making loosing strategies reverse <img src="https://forexsb.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> they still do not make money. Also at the time not so sure if I need to reverse only entry logic, or both exit and entry.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Irmantas]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9091/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-11-28T13:35:06Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47893/#p47893</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Reverse closing logic for "CCI Buy Sell Zones"]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47878/#p47878" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I want to make opposite entry/exit strategy of what I already have. For entry indicators logic there are opposites in indicator slots, but for exit logic there is only one option to exit on &quot;Sell zone is formed&quot; while using CCI Buy Sell Zones.&nbsp; I would like to use &quot;Buy zone is formed&quot; for buy exit. I tried to make this change in indicators code by myself .. however I know my programming skills are very low ... <img src="https://forexsb.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> If I change places only these code lines is it enough/correct?</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://image.prntscr.com/image/W8l8Jxf7StalvMmQIxfEog.png" alt="https://image.prntscr.com/image/W8l8Jxf7StalvMmQIxfEog.png" /></span></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Irmantas]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9091/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-11-27T16:05:47Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47878/#p47878</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
