<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Move EA to another broker]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/7043/" />
	<updated>2017-11-15T18:09:48Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/7043/move-ea-to-another-broker/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Move EA to another broker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47597/#p47597" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Myself, I trust that FSBPro has a serious look at each bar as it is processing the data and I try to stay away from MT4 except for trading.</p><p>You will notice that for backtesting, that FSBPro loads all of the time frames, whereas MT4 loads only what is called for by the strategy.</p><p>In my brief experience I have found that I do not need MT4 for very much.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Blaiserboy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2491/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-11-15T18:09:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47597/#p47597</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Move EA to another broker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47582/#p47582" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the replies.<br />FSB uses bar data so tick data is out. Does MT4 use tick data..is there any value in backtesting in MT4 using tick data.<br />Regards,</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[araza]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/10033/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-11-15T05:53:38Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47582/#p47582</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Move EA to another broker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47557/#p47557" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I have never used Tick data because FSBPro examines the bar structure.</p><p>Sleytus makes some good points about the number of bars in a test.. and I am aware that he is keeping track.... I have always used a lot more bars than he suggests.... I will do some research on my own to see if I can use fewer bars..</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Blaiserboy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2491/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-11-13T18:55:07Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47557/#p47557</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Move EA to another broker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47536/#p47536" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>My 2 cents...</p><p>I think it is all about optimizing / training your strategy against different patterns.&nbsp; The more patterns, the better.&nbsp; However, like with everything in life, there is a trade-off.&nbsp; Long-term data (i.e. many years) will include patterns that may never be seen again -- hence, you&#039;ll be training your strategy with irrelevant data -- which will skew the settings and yield poorer stats when your strategy encounters more recent patterns.&nbsp; Also, when you use many years worth of data then there are many more bars to calculate and optimizations take longer -- hence, limiting your ability to test lots of different strategies.</p><p>I think it is more about the number of bars and using recent data.&nbsp; As an example, for H4 I&#039;m using around 3000 bars.&nbsp; I think that works out to about 16 months.&nbsp; Actually -- it&#039;s 8 months each of recent EURUSD and USDCHF stitched together.</p><p>When I do a sanity check against MT4 or MT5 back testers using longer data horizons, the results are roughly consistent with FSBPro -- which means that optimizing / training with 3000 bars may be sufficient.&nbsp; So, I&#039;m gaining confidence emphasizing recent data horizons when generating and optimizing / training.</p><p>In a round about way I guess I&#039;m agreeing with Blaiserboy and footon.&nbsp; I don&#039;t think it is essential to use your Broker&#039;s data -- especially if you are trading longer time frames.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sleytus]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9721/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-11-13T08:17:20Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47536/#p47536</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Move EA to another broker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47535/#p47535" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks...<br />A strategy created and backtested on tickdata of 5 years and then checking it against broker data which is not very longterm should work fine..correct? or should I give up on the tickdata and work only on broker data even though on some timeframes it is about a years worth of data. <br />Can I really trust the robustness of the strategy on such shortterm data.<br />Regards,</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[araza]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/10033/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-11-13T07:20:41Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47535/#p47535</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Move EA to another broker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47441/#p47441" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Are you talking about MT tick data in tester? That is not real tick data first of all. Secondly, the 99% number thingy is another mambo-jumbo. Thirdly, what kind of data isn&#039;t broker specific? A synthetic set of average data from more than 3 brokers put together? Dave says correctly - reoptimize your portfolios. If you have valid strats, the majority of them should work just as well after reoptimization.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[footon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1242/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-11-07T08:27:16Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47441/#p47441</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Move EA to another broker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47439/#p47439" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Each broker is unique.. all have their own banks that they deal with .. therefore the data can be unique for each one.</p><p>Certainly if you are changing brokers you will have to reoptimize because the data bars are different.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Blaiserboy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2491/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-11-07T04:56:49Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47439/#p47439</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Move EA to another broker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47437/#p47437" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>what I was trying to get at was that if I have put in the work to make a portfolio and for some reason have to change the broker then I might have to reinvent the wheel. Of course I can test it and if the results are not what they are supposed to be then I am back to square one on an EA that was performing well..bigger problem when it is a portfolio.<br />any suggestions on getting this to work better or easier</p><p>people test against tickdata that is not broker specific..if that works then how can comm data be incorporated better?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[araza]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/10033/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-11-07T04:43:24Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47437/#p47437</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Move EA to another broker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47433/#p47433" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Spread, Commissions, Swaps ... are characteristics of the market and they are not stored in the expert file. <br />You can simply move your EA to the other broker and test it to see the performance.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-11-06T19:11:43Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47433/#p47433</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Move EA to another broker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47423/#p47423" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />If I have tested the EA using tickdata with 99% accuracy then it should not be a problem moving to a different broker.<br />My only concern is that the EA does not have anywhere the comm or the spread data as that comes when I test it against the broker data. <br />Is there a way to test on tickdata and then incorporate the comm and spread and swap rates etc in the EA.<br />Thanks</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[araza]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/10033/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-11-06T06:32:57Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/47423/#p47423</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
