<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Ambiguous Bars]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/6818/" />
	<updated>2017-09-27T18:07:53Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/6818/ambiguous-bars/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Ambiguous Bars]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46684/#p46684" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>wasusolake0123 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>How to fix Ambiguous bars?</p></blockquote></div><p>User guide tells the following:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>you can reduce the number of ambiguous bars and to make the test more reliable by switching on the Testing → Automatic Scan option. It will force Forex Strategy Builder to use all available intrabar data for better bar interpolation.</p></blockquote></div><p>And update data including lower timeframes.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[footon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1242/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-09-27T18:07:53Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46684/#p46684</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Ambiguous Bars]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46681/#p46681" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>How to fix Ambiguous bars?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[wasusolake0123]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/10080/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-09-27T14:18:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/46681/#p46681</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Ambiguous Bars]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/45499/#p45499" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Generally we want zero Ambiguous Bars because, depending on the strategy, sometimes even a smaller number of Ambiguous Bars leads to a big difference between the different interpolation methods.</p><p>The backtesting algorithm is designed produce lower output profit (provided that you use the Pessimistic method) and in most of the cases if a strategy shows a good backtest, it is reliable enough to be traded. However, it is possible to find a strategy that exploits the particular interpolation method in order to show an overestimated result. We detect such cases with the help of the <a href="https://forexsb.com/wiki/fsbpro_guide/comparator">Comparator</a>.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-08-13T04:57:10Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/45499/#p45499</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Ambiguous Bars]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/45498/#p45498" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I assume that the Acceptance Criteria for &quot;Max Ambiguous Bars&quot; should be changed according to a percentage of the total number of bars you are testing over?</p><p>What is an appropriate percentage of total bars to set this value at? Does the answer change when you are using only IS versus using both IS and OOS?</p><p>For example, if I generate over 100,000 bars, what would a good value be?</p><p>ThanX!<br />John</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[qattack]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9968/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-08-13T01:39:17Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/45498/#p45498</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
