<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Randomly Close Positions Effect - Monte Carlo]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/6757/" />
	<updated>2017-07-07T15:27:08Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/6757/randomly-close-positions-effect-monte-carlo/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Randomly Close Positions Effect - Monte Carlo]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44759/#p44759" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thats &quot;why&quot; the minutest details matter in quantitative trade systems</p><p>@DoCZero<br />Your doubt is very useful thank you for point it out</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[ViniQ]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9651/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-07-07T15:27:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44759/#p44759</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Randomly Close Positions Effect - Monte Carlo]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44758/#p44758" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>In my opinion it does not mean that your strategy is shit.</p></blockquote></div><p>Had to LOL at that.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[jimmydaytrades]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9850/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-07-07T14:35:45Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44758/#p44758</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Randomly Close Positions Effect - Monte Carlo]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44692/#p44692" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>Probably your systems exit is very important or it can be curve fitted (overoptimized). I just had one strategy with similar situation with randomly closing positions. In my opinion it does not mean that your strategy is shit. With my strategy example I was using a lot bigger Stop Loss than take profit, but also I used custom indicator to trigger exit logic before that SL is hit. So randomly closing positions through montecarlo test is not correct, because correct logic is not applied <img src="https://forexsb.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> To put it in other words exit had big edge in this strategy and montecarlo just ruins it.</p><p>Have a nice day</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Irmantas]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9091/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-07-04T08:21:23Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44692/#p44692</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Randomly Close Positions Effect - Monte Carlo]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44688/#p44688" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><strong>Monte Carlo</strong> is designed to set conditions that will break your strategy performance. This principle is valid also for the &quot;Randomly Close Positions&quot; simulation. <br />When we close a position randomly we actually test if it is on a profit at a random moment. Imagine that a strategy has a very good entry logic and it open positions just at the beginning of&nbsp; a trend and the positions go on a profit after the entry. Let&#039;s also this strategy has so good exit logic that it takes the profit on time and doesn&#039;t allow the positions to stay at a loosing state too long. The Randomly closing position in this case will not have big negative effect because the positions will be on profit most of the time.</p><p>On the other hand, if a strategy keeps the positions on a loosing state and only an effective exit rule close them on a slight profit, you can have a nice balance curve from the backtest. The randomly closing of&nbsp; a position will have a devastating effect on such strategy.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-07-04T07:34:02Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44688/#p44688</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Randomly Close Positions Effect - Monte Carlo]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44677/#p44677" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Randomly close positions turned off effect:</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://preview.ibb.co/jK46FF/systemresult3.jpg" alt="https://preview.ibb.co/jK46FF/systemresult3.jpg" /></span></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[DoCZero]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9907/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-07-03T12:21:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44677/#p44677</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Randomly Close Positions Effect - Monte Carlo]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44676/#p44676" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guys - I want to share with a strange situation I had been coming across. </p><p>Many times that I would build a system which had a positive result over a period of time - something like: </p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://image.ibb.co/nNwLaF/systemresult1.jpg" alt="https://image.ibb.co/nNwLaF/systemresult1.jpg" /></span></p><br /><p>Then I would put it into the Monte Carlo simulation as a cross check - and it would happily turn into: </p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://preview.ibb.co/mzbLaF/systemresult2.jpg" alt="https://preview.ibb.co/mzbLaF/systemresult2.jpg" /></span></p><p>So I really was confused why a good performing system on the same data, would drastically change. So I started investigating the different simulation options within the Monte Carlo simluator.&nbsp; &nbsp;Randomly close positions has the following effect&nbsp; (Picture in next post due to 2 link limit). </p><br /><br /><p>So I would like to find out:</p><p>1)&nbsp; Is it bugged , or working correctly?<br />2) Do you use this part of the simulation? <br />3) I assume that running an EA on a VPS would have minimal of these kinds of errors.. what do you think?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[DoCZero]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9907/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-07-03T12:20:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44676/#p44676</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
