<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — How much Slots is better?What you mean about that and the results?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/6721/" />
	<updated>2017-06-20T21:39:47Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/6721/how-much-slots-is-betterwhat-you-mean-about-that-and-the-results/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: How much Slots is better?What you mean about that and the results?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44390/#p44390" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The more slots you use...... the greater the odds for curve fitting.</p><p>You should be ok using two or three slots......</p><p>Keep the thing simple or you will have to continually re optimize.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Blaiserboy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2491/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-06-20T21:39:47Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44390/#p44390</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[How much Slots is better?What you mean about that and the results?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44339/#p44339" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>i wanted to know if someone try it also to get better results.</p><p>Is it better to generate strategies first with max 2 opening logic slots and 2 maximum closing slots?</p><p>When i get good results than i open one Strategy with nice statistics and put it again on generator, but now i lock the previous found logics, so the generator is trying to find better strategy from the best.</p><p>Someone do it so and how good will be the results.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[deadlef]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9894/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-06-17T08:41:45Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/44339/#p44339</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
