<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Inconsistent test results FSB-MT4]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/6437/" />
	<updated>2016-12-29T01:59:54Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/6437/inconsistent-test-results-fsbmt4/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Inconsistent test results FSB-MT4]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40596/#p40596" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>you can use the sliders on the left side....</p><p>put a value of, say, 1 in system quality.</p><p>BUT, first. attach the strategy so Popov can examine for a bug because he&nbsp; thinks there is a little bug that is affecting the output.</p><p>Let him examine that strategy to detect whatever might be a problem before you try to do much more.</p><p>I have had the same problem. and thought it was because of a bad strategy, I did not realize was a bug.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Blaiserboy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2491/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-29T01:59:54Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40596/#p40596</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Inconsistent test results FSB-MT4]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40579/#p40579" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Popov wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Mhm, It works with my settings. Probably the other settings make the difference.</p><p><a href="http://postimg.org/image/bfu0fkmmv/"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://s23.postimg.org/bfu0fkmmv/screenshot_2016_12_27_at_22_51_01.jpg" alt="http://s23.postimg.org/bfu0fkmmv/screenshot_2016_12_27_at_22_51_01.jpg" /></span></a></p></blockquote></div><p>What settings I must look? On one screen is a clearly bug - checked filter not worked out.<br /><a href="http://savepic.net/8750113.htm"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://savepic.net/8750113m.png" alt="http://savepic.net/8750113m.png" /></span></a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[AnarchoTrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9526/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-27T21:08:51Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40579/#p40579</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Inconsistent test results FSB-MT4]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40578/#p40578" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>AnarchoTrader wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>footon wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Your tester report says the following - <em><span style="color:red">Control points (a very crude method, the results must not be considered)</span></em></p></blockquote></div><p>On the other tickers this test method worked normal. Tick test in MT4 is still not correct, tics a artificial, and it terribly slow.<br />But I will try.</p></blockquote></div><p>Hmm. On tick-test in MT4 and MT5 the results are correct!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[AnarchoTrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9526/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-27T21:07:12Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40578/#p40578</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Inconsistent test results FSB-MT4]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40577/#p40577" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Mhm, It works with my settings. Probably the other settings make the difference.</p><p><a href="http://postimg.org/image/bfu0fkmmv/"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://s23.postimg.org/bfu0fkmmv/screenshot_2016_12_27_at_22_51_01.jpg" alt="http://s23.postimg.org/bfu0fkmmv/screenshot_2016_12_27_at_22_51_01.jpg" /></span></a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-27T20:51:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40577/#p40577</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Inconsistent test results FSB-MT4]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40576/#p40576" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Popov wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>AnarchoTrader, it must be zero for loosing strategies only. Please send me the strategy for a test. It must be a bug or at least it looks like one.</p></blockquote></div><p>I add the file.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[AnarchoTrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9526/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-27T20:48:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40576/#p40576</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Inconsistent test results FSB-MT4]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40575/#p40575" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.. very strange... Perhaps after adjusting usdjpy symbol properties. I changed the method for calculating the Commission to the more correct, from money to % (by the way, Miroslav, please do more digits after the decimal point in the field for the Commission - can not fit 0,002% -&nbsp; 20$ for 1,000,000).<br />Now all that founded strategy in the repository are displayed with zero SQN and do not satisfy the Acceptance criteria. While previously it was not. Now even with a marked checkbox - not show it - it showed.</p><p>And now Generator strategies can no longer find any normal strategies. All new generated have SQN = 0 and not fulfil Acceptance criteria.</p><p><a href="http://savepic.net/8750113.htm"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://savepic.net/8750113m.png" alt="http://savepic.net/8750113m.png" /></span></a></p><p><a href="http://savepic.net/8772640.htm"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://savepic.net/8772640m.png" alt="http://savepic.net/8772640m.png" /></span></a></p><p><a href="http://savepic.net/8759328.htm"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://savepic.net/8759328m.png" alt="http://savepic.net/8759328m.png" /></span></a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[AnarchoTrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9526/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-27T20:46:22Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40575/#p40575</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Inconsistent test results FSB-MT4]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40574/#p40574" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>AnarchoTrader, it must be zero for loosing strategies only. Please send me the strategy for a test. It must be a bug or at least it looks like one.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-27T20:45:39Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40574/#p40574</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Inconsistent test results FSB-MT4]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40573/#p40573" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>System Quality Number is a ratio calculated by a formula..... I suggest that you establish a minimum on the Control panel so that you do not record inferior strategies as they will turn out to be a waste of time.<br />Read about System Quality Number on the internet and then apply it in the Acceptance Criteria of Control Panel.</p><p>If you accept strategies that are a low quality you will have tremendous frustration when you start to use them.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Blaiserboy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2491/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-27T19:33:36Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40573/#p40573</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Inconsistent test results FSB-MT4]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40572/#p40572" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The other question, is why System quality number is zero?<br /><a href="http://savepic.net/8734765.htm"><span class="postimg"><img src="http://savepic.net/8734765m.png" alt="http://savepic.net/8734765m.png" /></span></a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[AnarchoTrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9526/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-27T19:27:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40572/#p40572</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Inconsistent test results FSB-MT4]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40571/#p40571" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>footon wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Your tester report says the following - <em><span style="color:red">Control points (a very crude method, the results must not be considered)</span></em></p></blockquote></div><p>On the other tickers this test method worked normal. Tick test in MT4 is still not correct, tics a artificial, and it terribly slow.<br />But I will try.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[AnarchoTrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9526/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-27T19:19:36Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40571/#p40571</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Inconsistent test results FSB-MT4]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40569/#p40569" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Your tester report says the following - <em><span style="color:red">Control points (a very crude method, the results must not be considered)</span></em></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[footon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1242/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-27T18:29:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40569/#p40569</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Inconsistent test results FSB-MT4]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40568/#p40568" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Probably different data, you will have to verify that the data in the two programs is the same, I suggest that you redownload FSB data and see if that fixes the problem</p><p>There should be no reason to waste time running MT4, I can assure you that FSBPro is much more accurate and the diagnostics in FSBPro are far superior.</p><p>Once you have established that your data in FSBPro is accurate, there is no need to be running MT4 except as a bridge to the market</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Blaiserboy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2491/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-27T16:10:25Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40568/#p40568</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Inconsistent test results FSB-MT4]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40567/#p40567" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Its strange. I already make two robots on eurusd and gbpusd. Their backtests on FSB and MT4 the almost identically.</p><p>Now I&#039;m working with usdjpy and tests on FSB and MT4 tester do not mach. I try different experts and always the backtest results a seriously different on FSB and MT4.<br />Even at the different data sources balance graph not so bad. But on the tester MT4 very different result.<br />I adding files and screenshorts.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[AnarchoTrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/9526/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-27T15:47:29Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/40567/#p40567</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
