Another direction of development is to provide a way the indicators to see the account and the trades. It will open many new opportunities.

Why it's bad news? The fact that the standard indi is not meant to do this doesn't necessarily mean it is impossible in FSB. That's what custom indicators are for.

In such case I recall my original scepticism

Is the access into the FSB Pro code excluded?
Just a vague idea from a programming analphabet: What about adding a "variable constant" into the formula for counting the average price of currently opened positions that allows entering the next "Winner" position (for "Loser" vice versa, of course). The variable constant would increase with every entered position, in steps given by the grid.

I wonder about a loop in the round number indicator

or a 'wait' command

I actually have no idea as I am unfamiliar with indicator building in FSBPro

Were I writing something in Mql I would be trying thoise two or using a varialble to store the last entry price.

FSB indis do not have access to position info, no entry price is possible in a reliable way, only if price has been at a level is known.

or a 'wait' command

I actually have no idea as I am unfamiliar with indicator building in FSBPro

Were I writing something in Mql I would be trying thoise two or using a varialble to store the last entry price.

Footon... what do u think he can use to achieve that sequence of orders....

He wants one every so many pips

I have been trying also to come up with something but am stuck.

Round Number is essentially the way to go, the problem seems to be that a grid-level should contribute addition only once - this is the tricky part. We could neglect a level if price has visited it, but for how long it should stay obliviated? Forever seems to be a bad choice, because nearly all price levels will be wiped out...

He wants one every so many pips

I have been trying also to come up with something but am stuck.

Let's hope that Popov will find any alternative solution. I believe the grid-type entry can help to realize some interesting strategies, if used in a controlled way.

Strange adding to winning positions (at the same price level !?) can be seen on the backtest showing trades from 18th and 23rd September.

The sample strategy and M1 data from September 2014 are attached.

It would be great, if you find a solution. Thanks in advance.

I agree, but what about the issue with adding winning positions in equal steps?

Show me a strategy, data and the bar where it happens. I'll check it and fix it if it is necessary.

It works fine:

Round Number
Digits     Numbers
2          11440.0 11450.0
3          11400.0 11500.0
4          11000.0 12000.0