<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — computing gpu]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/4562/" />
	<updated>2013-12-18T13:21:12Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/4562/computing-gpu/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23098/#p23098" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>tnickel wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Hi,<br />the biggest problem ist not the speed.<br />FSB pro uses more CPU-Cores<br />If you have a computer with 6 cores form intel you get 12 hyperthreads.<br />You can build very fast the strategies.</p><p>But 99% of the strategies don´t work.<br />99% are curvefittet, I think this is the biggest problem, not the speed.</p><p>thomas</p></blockquote></div><p>Between the two issues, there may be a strong connection.Curvefit can occur due to the small number of bars used. As I wrote in another post &quot;FSB generates too many &quot;good strategies&quot; that are very difficult to verify without having a method of measuring their robustness (WFE). I mean the old principles of Robert Pardo.My proposal is to use a genetic optimizer with settable parameters.(population size, max generations, fitness functions, etc) ,<strong> and most important , a WFA (walk forward analyser) module.</strong> .Until this proposal will be considered, no choice but to do WFA &quot;manual&quot;.<br />It is a long and painful task.<br />When you have to make 10 - 20 optimizations, each with 4-8 parameters,on 200000-500000 bars charts, speed really does matter!.<br />To write an application that can load 8 (16) cores at&gt; 80% capacity, is a task that could not be solved neither by giant companies such as TradeStation.(BTW: only, whom I know, who have solved the problem are the guys from Multichatrs).<br />In conclusion: In order to find robust strategies is needed WFA. But WFA requires higher computing speed (in parallel for all core).<br />FSB-Pro does not succeed load my CPU more than 12-15% (probably like yours, as well). <br /> So no need for GPU, but it requires a software written &quot;otherwise&quot;.<br />But, as&nbsp; Mr. Popov said, parallel programming is very complicated. This means much more money to spend...Free is too cheap!<br />For better strategies we`ll have to pay ( I presume...)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[B52]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/7713/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-12-18T13:21:12Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23098/#p23098</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23078/#p23078" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>thomas</p><p>I have 4 cores and I do not find the processing to be much faster than old version, I am wondering if 6 cores is much better...</p><p>I am just about needing a new machine, that is why I am asking your opinion.</p><p>Thanks</p><p>daveM</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Blaiserboy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2491/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-12-17T16:11:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23078/#p23078</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23061/#p23061" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />the biggest problem ist not the speed.<br />FSB pro uses more CPU-Cores<br />If you have a computer with 6 cores form intel you get 12 hyperthreads.<br />You can build very fast the strategies.</p><p>But 99% of the strategies don´t work.<br />99% are curvefittet, I think this is the biggest problem, not the speed.</p><p>thomas</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[tnickel]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/5655/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-12-16T19:16:58Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23061/#p23061</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23023/#p23023" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>ok thanks</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sandritanews]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/7113/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-12-14T21:53:20Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23023/#p23023</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23022/#p23022" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Testing is already fast in FSB, to spend significant amount of development time and effort to gain maybe a tenth(?) in backtest is madness.</p><p>Generation on the other hand can benefit, but as Blaiser touched upon, it has been discussed already at length.<br /><a href="http://forexsb.com/forum/post/22512/#p22512">http://forexsb.com/forum/post/22512/#p22512</a><br /><a href="http://forexsb.com/forum/post/19817/#p19817">http://forexsb.com/forum/post/19817/#p19817</a><br /><a href="http://forexsb.com/forum/post/17473/#p17473">http://forexsb.com/forum/post/17473/#p17473</a><br /><a href="http://forexsb.com/forum/post/17605/#p17605">http://forexsb.com/forum/post/17605/#p17605</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[footon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1242/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-12-14T15:46:52Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23022/#p23022</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23021/#p23021" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Popov has already discussed a reply to this. it is not going to be changed from what I recall from the other thread.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Blaiserboy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2491/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-12-14T15:22:59Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23021/#p23021</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23018/#p23018" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>most fast than cpu <br />and to generate strategy</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sandritanews]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/7113/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-12-14T13:24:12Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23018/#p23018</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: computing gpu]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23013/#p23013" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Why do you need GPU for <span class="bbu">testing</span>?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[footon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1242/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-12-13T23:13:12Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23013/#p23013</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[computing gpu]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23012/#p23012" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />can i use gpu to strategy testing?<br />if i can how?<br />my pc only use cpu cores<br />thanks</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sandritanews]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/7113/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-12-13T22:21:46Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/23012/#p23012</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
