My real question is "Is ForexStrategyExecutor still supported?" I know the new FSB Pro can also do multiple strategies but ForexStrategyExecutor requires less resources on my very limit env.

thanks

many thank's

Thank you togr.

This solution searches the MT history and checks closed orders profit. It adds to multiplier when an order is closed at a loss. It may work on single orders, but may fail on adding.
If a position is formed by multiple additions, FST sees it as a single position but MT4 sees it as multiple single orders. When such position is closed, some of it forming orders may be closed at loss despite the fact the aggregate position is on profit. In such a case this solution will increase the multiplier for a single losing forming order.

I know it is simple hack But at least it should work for strategies without add/reduce trade size.
For pure martinagle strategy is should be enough

This solution searches the MT history and checks closed orders profit. It adds to multiplier when an order is closed at a loss. It may work on single orders, but may fail on adding.
If a position is formed by multiple additions, FST sees it as a single position but MT4 sees it as multiple single orders. When such position is closed, some of it forming orders may be closed at loss despite the fact the aggregate position is on profit. In such a case this solution will increase the multiplier for a single losing forming order.

I cannot contribute to development as I quit programming at the university. However i was able to create and finance the project on Guru.com to fix the bug when FST did not correctly calculate trade size when using martingale.

Pls find the fixed code attached and after testing incorporate it in the fst. It works as far as i can tell, the main difference is the martingale in FST need to be set to 1 and you are setting it directly in expert in mt4.

Thanks!

Where could I get them?

Thanks in advance!

togr wrote:

Hi,

i do not want to bother you guys, you are doing great job, so just a suggestion Can you fix the bug with martingale when you are rewritting the code for FST=> Executor?
Thanks indeed.

How do you plan to fix the bug when the developer said there's no solution in sight yet?

I am not programmer so i can't tell.
my point was if the guys are rewritting the code it might require less effort to do it at aonce.

Hi,

i do not want to bother you guys, you are doing great job, so just a suggestion Can you fix the bug with martingale when you are rewritting the code for FST=> Executor?
Thanks indeed.

How do you plan to fix the bug when the developer said there's no solution in sight yet?

I solved a problem of association of several Trader's in one appendix. They do not disturb each other and trade in different streams. Strategy are remembered and at start are restored in different tabpages. But, it was necessary to change the Trader's and Builder's code a little. namespace is changed. Files of languages from Trader and Builder are incorporated and files of configurations are incorporated too. And also, in one of tabpages I placed Builder. And also, Trader and Builder remained in the form of separate files.

Hi,

i do not want to bother you guys, you are doing great job, so just a suggestion Can you fix the bug with martingale when you are rewritting the code for FST=> Executor?
Thanks indeed.

http://depositfiles.com/files/yda8n2bpn

It will be necessary to alter a little, of course, "Data" (to transfer to separate structure of Data.ConnectionID, Data.Strategy.StrategyName, Data.StrategyName) and a configuration to divide into the general and containing information on each added strategy, and also, to transfer to the loading module from Action loading of indicators and the same general things, but, such changes will keep compatibility with FST and will not take a lot of time. The UserInterface\BaseForm form with bookmarks is added and Actions is a little changed.

Success to all!