<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Speeding Up FSB]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/2545/" />
	<updated>2012-02-14T00:48:42Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/2545/speeding-up-fsb/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Speeding Up FSB]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/12551/#p12551" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I love that you can launch as many FSB&#039;s as you want and each will chug in it&#039;s own space. I run several at once trying all sorts of combinations. I&#039;m only using 50k bars for each, not sure I need more than that. My goal is to fully load the processor (100%) especially for overnight generating.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dusktrader]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/5552/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-02-14T00:48:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/12551/#p12551</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Speeding Up FSB]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/10989/#p10989" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Other than the aforementioned you just need a lot of memory.<br />Ive seen FSB eat up 500MB+ of RAM so to cover that x 6 instances + overhead for the system, 4GB would seem useful.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[prox]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/4737/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-17T13:43:07Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/10989/#p10989</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Speeding Up FSB]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/10938/#p10938" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Greetings,<br />I`m planing to upgrade my computer with a 6 core amd processor. What impact this will have on FSB work? Will it run 6 FSB with no sweat?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[metrade]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/4753/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-12T18:17:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/10938/#p10938</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Speeding Up FSB]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/10933/#p10933" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s a pretty big memory bandwidth overhead in running multiple instances of FSB not to mention if one tries to exhaust a combination space on 2 or more individual instances, youre bound to do at least some of the same tests more than once.</p><p>Its very nice to see that each cycle is independent. That should ease the process of threading for further enhancement to the capabilities of current 4/6 core systems.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[prox]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/4737/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-10-12T14:45:04Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/10933/#p10933</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Speeding Up FSB]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/10246/#p10246" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>FSB uses 1 core only. This core goes to 95-98%, but if you have 2 core processor, the windows show 50%.</p><p>If you want to load your comp, you can run one FSB for each core.<br />Each calculation cycle of the generator is independent, therefore 2 FSB for 1 hour run = 1 FSB for 2 hours.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-08-24T09:29:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/10246/#p10246</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Speeding Up FSB]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/10244/#p10244" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>FSB seems to restrict the CPU usage to 50%. If I leave my computer running overnight with nothing else to do except generate a strategy it seems it could do a lot more work if I could increase this to say 90%. Is it possible to do this?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[SpiderMan]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/4094/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-08-24T08:02:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/10244/#p10244</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
