<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forex Software — Backtest of EAStudio differ from MT5]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/feed/atom/topic/10075/" />
	<updated>2026-06-15T18:28:48Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/topic/10075/backtest-of-eastudio-differ-from-mt5/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Backtest of EAStudio differ from MT5]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83342/#p83342" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like data difference if there&#039;s no correlation between results. Although I remember years ago I had a similar experience after mt update. I was not doing strategy testing, but indi testing to see if I get matching signals and everything changed overnight after it updated. Demo test signals had 100% match, backtest crapper turned useless.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[footon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/1242/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-06-15T18:28:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83342/#p83342</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Backtest of EAStudio differ from MT5]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83341/#p83341" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>hey i also struggle a lot to get the same or nearly same backtest as in eas and mt5 .</p><p>i use your dukascopy on eg and validate the collection in eas. than i have eg a portfolio with Profit factor 3 and my curve. when i now make backtest with same settings in mt5 i get complete different results. this was not before i dont know since which date it comes.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Roughey]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/10939/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-06-15T16:35:26Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83341/#p83341</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Backtest of EAStudio differ from MT5]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83292/#p83292" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I assume both a corect (in their way of computation).</p><p>The most important for you is the backtest in MetaTrader 5 with Real ticks.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Popov]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/2/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-05-11T13:44:22Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83292/#p83292</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Backtest of EAStudio differ from MT5]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83291/#p83291" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p><p>I downloaded the price data from my FTMO MT5 to the EAStudio<br />with spread of 10 points (the typical spread is 2-5 points- EURUSD)<br />then created strategies - optimized for 2016-2025<br />the good ones i (bactested on MT5 for the first months of 2026, and then) backtested on MT5 for 2016- 2025<br />usually number of trades is similar, but the results many times very different</p><p>Who can explain? Which of them is right?</p><p>Regards,<br />Avraham</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[shenkar23]]></name>
				<uri>https://forexsb.com/forum/user/19969/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-05-11T12:13:36Z</updated>
			<id>https://forexsb.com/forum/post/83291/#p83291</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
